radu_floricica
Joined 18 years ago
Joined 18 years ago
Drones can be hidden near the front, and will carry individual soldiers plus equipment. Nobody has 20 manpads at ready, and would be funny to shoot S300 at them. They can be used for short jumps - go over the immediate front line, or over a river, or a mine field. Doubt they'll carry 200 pounds for over a few clicks - but enough to get behind the enemy.
There is very little actionable information here. Nuclear is still worth building, in countries that don't overregulate it (China is doing it, even while they export the solar panels that everybody is buying). Solar is hitting pretty steep marginal returns on the value of generated watt, because it's all running at the same time and not necessarily when energy is most needed. We still haven't solved cheap battery storage. etc.
I think it's just complicated. I'm pretty sure dentists go to the most conferences per year, possibly way above any other specialty. And since I doubt whatever perks they get are worth the trouble, I'm forced to believe them that they're constantly finding out about new stuff.
And the one piece of actionable advice I got from my own experiences: ReminPro melon flavor is a wonderfully tasty toothpaste, and it will actually remineralize your teeth. I no longer wince at hot/cold stuff. Downside is that it's somewhat pricy, and you'll probably need to order online from specialty shops.
Also get a water flosser.
I know it's a small example, but it's a real effect that languages/libraries/frameworks become less and less important, when intelligence and code generation get better and cheaper.
That's exactly why we convert things to money - so we don't use arbitrary measurements. An energy use is not "wasteful", it can only be expensive. Which is worth or not, depending on particular conditions.
It's not about needing to trust proofs (or treatments) to use them. It's about goal alignment.
For starters, a VPS for each claude code project (with a simple orchestrator and project creator).
I'm also playing lowkey with small ESP32 powered automations, and having a VPS to monitor them, show a web interface and push updates. And I've just added a small REPL like module.
And how did you intervene? Does it have permissions to send emails, or it only created the draft?
This is a pretty interesting example and highly relevant, but details matter a lot if we want to use it as a lesson.
I'd like to know that when I'm reading a comment, it's written (or at least endorsed) by a human being. Currently that's.. debatable, and it's only going to be more so. Entities with cash and resources can focus on the topics relevant to them and drown the conversation. I'd like to at least know that the idiotic replies I'm getting are real human idiots, and not astroturfing in one shape or another.
An example would be the european reaction to AC. It's a way of using technology to solve warming, its costs are perfectly acceptable, but it is still frown upon because... well, it's beyond the scope of a HN comment to diagnose why, but it's an example of technology being able to mitigate a problem but not being allowed to.