rad_gruchalski

Who decides when one has too many of something?

Ignorance is easy to hide behind many words.

Ignorance clusters easily. You’ll have no problem finding alike.

Close down the toilets. Poof, problem gone. Think about applying to DOGE. They may like your ideas.

Not everyone sits on a bazillion tons of natural gas and oil. Also, there are 5.5 million people in Norway. Though, Denmark is almost the same population, they have no bazillion tons of oil and natural gas. See the problem?

Apparently

> It has totally separate civil construction and worker safety rules.

A GmbH is s for-profit company. They have a managing director, shareholders, … ultimately it’s a for—profit org established on an insider-level knowledge and good luck creating a competitive business to the one of those players. Case in point: Bundesanzeiger Verlag GmbH.

But why focus on the car only? To me it would be interesting to know where has the driver got the driver license from. Or if they have a medical condition. Or maybe they have a stiff neck on the day of the accident. Were they distracted by children?

I’m probably failing to see the difference between Peugeot 208 or Renault 5 being involved in an accident. What insights could one expect from this info?

> Why is that the standard? I, a human, can’t handle driving in Mumbai.

Aren’t you confusing “navigating” vs “driving”?

I have so many issues with German “sovereign” initiatives founded as GmbH companies. This feels so uncompetitive.

What’s wrong with that?

Why is it even relevant what car was involved in an accident?

> without the pseudocontroller

I am making an assumption. I assume that you mean the deployment. The deployment is responsible for individual pods. If a pod goes away, the deployment brings a new pod in. The deployment controls individual pods.

To answer your question: yes, you can simply create pods without the deployment. But then you are fully responsible for their lifecycle and failures. The deployment makes your life easier.