racer-v
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
If it's well run, you aren't working late every night and every weekend.
If it's run by sociopaths who want to keep their employees in a state of perpetual crisis in order to maximize the value of their shares, it's pretty awful.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Werner_Heisenberg#1945:_Alsos_...
It makes the story even more interesting to see Bohr and Heisenberg participating on opposite sides.
https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/87a8ea/1927_group_pho...
Schrödinger, Pauli, Heisenberg, Dirac, de Broglie, Bohr, Planck, Curie, Lorentz, Einstein... the number of Nobel Prizes here is left as an exercise.
One could also argue that both Windows and Unix were necessary phases for general computing given limited hardware resources, and only now is the stateless functional paradise envisioned at MIT in the 1960's actually possible.
-o fieldseparator=,
-o fieldkeys=2,1,3
which could be used by any program whose capabilities require such a specifier, could be parsed from config files and environment variables, and aliased for reduced verbosity.
My basic philosophical disagreement is with the idea of avoiding interactive command shortcuts. This essentially limits you to only using command line features you can memorize, or be willing to look them up every single time. There are too many commands, with totally inconsistent argument styles, for this to be practical.
The result is that you're only going to use a small subset of the command line's power if you limit yourself in this way.
RANT: Yes, I agree alias ll="ls -l" is a crutch. But why does 'sort' use -t for separator and -f for field, while 'cut' uses -d and -k? The famously composable Unix tools really aren't very consistent. Radically improved tab completion and documentation (vs man pages and Info) might be a start, but in the end you have to evolve new syntax.