qwerki

I'm working in the "plant" to "internet" space you mentioned and seeing this first-hand. Would be very keen to have a chat if you have the time please. Email in bio.

With every haphazard decision we're getting a very public experiment demonstrating the value of "giving people what they want" vs "everything else". It's astonishing how resilient the network effects behind the product in this case are against sabotage. Good lesson in startups there. You just need to laser focus on creating value for the customer – everything else doesn't matter as much as you think it does? Maybe even by power of 10 factors?

The open source community in general needs to pay more attention to this space – not just the python ecosystem. More maintainers need to know that well intentioned people are proposing policies that would in some instances make them financially and legally liable for the code they write.

Hi! Thanks for trying it out. I have reached out via email but just in case, looks like your account is configured for only first level dependencies. If you increase it to 3 levels it'll show much better results. You're also able to adjust the distribution of funds via boosting in the dependencies page.

Please note the donation will be kept in PENDING state for 5 days to allow time for full dependency analysis, adjustments via boost and/or exclusions. In this time we'll be reaching out to the other projects in your dependency tree to onboard them.

Please ping me if you need anything. Many thanks again!

You're right @fmx. Have now updated the FAQ per helpfulclippy's suggestion. Thanks for pointing this out!

Actioned. Thank you helpfulclippy! :)

♥

Thanks quickthrower2!

Re gaming the system you're totally right. Although slightly unintuitive, we've also heard the opposite from maintainers. That they'll be motivated to remove the silly one line packages from their dependency trees due to the imbalance of value they provide vs extract.

We also prune self dependencies, circular dependencies and a few other cases to keep things level. Hopefully we'll be at a stage to open source our codebase soon and can better leverage community feedback in this space :)

Thanks for your kind words and trying it out @djaouen! Please don't hesitate to ping me if you need anything (email in profile).

Hi Animesh! The biggest difference would be that TD answers both "who should I sponsor AND how much?". It continually calculates the weight of each dependency in your codebase and distributes your monthly budget accordingly.

The next biggest difference is that it distributes micro-payments up to 3 levels deep into the dependency tree. We've noticed majority of people sponsor the top of mind projects, but the deep nested dependencies don't get any love. This automated approach should fix that.

Don't hesitate to ping me if you have any other questions please (email in profile).

Hi Koito17 Thanks for trying it out! Are you able to ping me your github handle so I can get to the bottom of it (email in profile).

Alternatively, for multi-project repos you can add a thanks.yaml file to the root of the repo with a `maxDepth: 2` value inside it. Unfortunately, deep scanning the entire repo looking for files would be prohibitive due to GH rate limiting hence this approach.

Please keep me posted. I'm also available on Discord if you need anything.

Many thanks for the encouraging words! :)