quantumHazer

> Fable didn't even need to debug it; I believe essentially all the assembly worked correctly on the first try.

so you don't know if it works properly or not

Probably llm slop

> There are many ways to build for the web, both with and without AI. If AI is a part of your workflow, we think this tool will help make it even more productive. And if it isn’t, that’s OK too.

Crazy thing to say in 2026 where if you write code and not delegate every bit to an agent you're considered a noob by some people.

also, there is multiple models called codex or that have codex as a "suffix" eg. "gpt-5.3-codex"

you can’t iterate fast over quality though. it takes patience and expertise, not a bloated repo like this.

every example you mentioned is not something you should delegate to LLMs, unless quick prototyping

> not using GenAI could mean project won't be competitive in current landscape

why? this is false in my opinion, iterating fast is not a good indicator of quality nor competitiveness

the author is an employee of Cursor/Anysphere. i think this should've been declared at the start of the article. it's always like this.

Not unpopular at all. I think it's one of the best Ferrari ever made.

Or maybe, hear me out, we don't need any of this ""agent"" first shiny thingy

I wouldn’t be surprised if this is undisclosed PR from Anthropic

Why are we commenting the Claude subreddit?

1) it’s not impartial

2) it’s useless hype commentary

3) it’s literally astroturfing at this point

Seems pretty false if you look at the model card and web site of Opus 4.5 that is… (check notes) their latest model.

> it won’t make sense to learn how to code.

Sure. So we can keep paying money to your employer, Anthropic, right?

Last year’s model were at 50-60% on SWE bench-verified actually