Recent submissions

Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Increasing supply chain resiliency by having multiple, geographically separated, sites this more of a thing now.

https://hbr.org/2020/09/global-supply-chains-in-a-post-pande...

"The obvious way to address heavy dependence on one medium-risk or high-risk source (a single factory, supplier, or region) is to add more sources in locations not vulnerable to the same risks."

Comment · 4 years ago
> node names are entirely unrelated to any physical dimensions

I agree they're not necessarily related to any particular transistor dimension but are you sure it's entirely unrelated to any physical dimensions? If so, here is a question I have. 28nm, 22nm, 20nm, 14nm, 10nm, 7nm, 5nm, 3nm. What progression is that? Why skip 6nm and 4nm?

Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
The comment was in the context of a San Francisco City Ordnance, so the question is, does the City of San Francisco use Real-time continuous facial recognition? Today the answer is no, but that's likely to change; therefore, any forward-looking ordnance should take it as a given.
Comment · 4 years ago
> The ordinance basically presumes a context of continuous, 24 hour surveillance or access thereto.

I definitely agree with everything that you wrote but real-time continuous facial recognition is going to be here sooner rather than later. In the context of reforming this ordinance, it makes sense to just assume it's available. To me anyway.

Comment · 4 years ago
It depends, is the wafer passing or failing the manufacturing tests? This is an important consideration.
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
Comment · 4 years ago
I suppose depending on how extreme we're going with unfocusing on math.

But one doesn't really get to ignore math in life because of money. You'll still need to figure some things out. I can say I'm a poor painter so I'm just going to ignore that and things will be fine. The cost of ignoring math can be quite high.

Comment · 4 years ago
Definitely.

I think when people say they suck at math what they mean is; I find math homework extremely boring and unrewarding. Which perpetuates sucking at math and only compounds. Then things get worse as modern society works better for the individual when one does not totally suck a math.

Kinda like, I suck at piano because I find practicing the piano boring and unrewarding, but without the ramifications of sucking at math.

Comment · 4 years ago
Just to expand on this, when I worked as a grader in college I noted on engineering test keys the professor's answers were always roughly three short lines of handwritten equation. But the student's answer section were often totally darken with pencil they wrote so much. The heuristic was definitely the longer the answer the more wrong it was.

This is something I've taken to heart professionally too. If the equations are getting out of hand it's either wrong or I need some simplifying assumptions (like that cow needs to be spherical). Otherwise one just can't keep track of it and reason about it.

If I need a more precise answer, that's what computer numerics is for.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton