pyth0

Because if you have hundreds or thousands of them you presumably want a way to control and monitor them.

What does this mean?

Antifa is not one organization, that's ridiculous. It would be like claiming that "Anarchists" are a terrorist organization.

Riveting discussion. How about you reply with something of substance instead of just presumptuous and pedantic quips.

I have first hand experience. Also "depression" is different from "chronic depression". You can experience the former as the direct result of some cause.

Chronic depression doesn't usually have a "cause" that you can fix without some form of treatment. It happens that these meds often do remove the extreme effects of depression and allow you to focus on other problems.

Did you stop reading at the em-dash?

> Artificial Intelligence is writing about as well as humans — at least well enough to cause confusion and speculation

No matter your opinion on AI writing, this is just a fact.

This is literally the point of stacked PRs. You implement the refactor in branch A, then branch B is created on top of that so you can implement your feature. Then you make separate PRs, one for merging branch A into main, and another for merging branch B into A. The GitHub feature just provides a nicer UX when interacting with such PRs by clearly showing dependency and allowing you to merge a stack together.

That is in fact the point of this. Split your large feature into smaller, more manageable PRs and have them still be connected within GitHub.

> What's much less believable is the way they frame it: the model escaped, and did it on its own.

That's clearly what happened though, based on the detailed postmortem. The model was instructed to pass the benchmark (that's the harness that was involved, the ExploitGym harness), and the model determined on it's own that the easiest way to achieve the the goal was to gain access to the answers directly from HF. Which is what it did.

You might be able to say that HF made some amateurish mistakes, but this attack certainly was fairly sophisticated. It relied a number of separate exploits or vulnerabilities that it combined and used over the course of multiple days. Calling it otherwise seems to be downplaying it.

Just so I understand your objection, they are woke because in the game one of their studios made, the woman in the game wasn't attractive enough for you?

Under which OS would a website not be sandboxed? It's the browser doing the sandboxing, not the OS.