psbp

Alaskans used Denali for generations, before and after it was arbitrarily named McKinley.

The Caravaggio was incredible too.

Doesn't pass the analog clock test either.

I have been this person. I can say that it's not a time of my life I look back on fondly.

The process of thinking and exploring ideas is inherently enriching.

Nothing can take away your ability to have incredible experiences, except if the robots kill us all.

There is legal precedent establishing healthcare providers' obligations in life-threatening situations. The same moral responsibility should exist when insurers deny lifesaving care, it's just hidden behind bureaucracy.

The interactive element itself could be really powerful. If you could put some restrictions on how much of the answer it can give you all at once, it's the perfect incremental learning tool.

It's funny that if I could describe my entire career, it would probably be something similar to software janitor/maintenance worker.

I guess I should have pursued a PhD when I was younger.

My brain processes too slow for modern action movies.

I can tell what's going on, but I always end up feeling agitated.

Skeptic and completely reactionary. I had to unfollow him on Twitter because he always has to have a "take" on every AI headline, and he's often contradictory between "AI is useless" and "AI is a huge threat".

This is such a complete misreading of what's happening. Not sure why I keep seeing this on HN.

You don't understand how much value was lost, even if OpenAI perfectly migrates over to Microsoft (it will be messy). Sam had no incentive to not continue with the existing OpenAI structure.

No one knows.

I'd like to hear more about the board's argument before deciding that this was "virtuous board vs greedy capitalist". The motivations for both sides is still unclear.