proksoup
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
I'm not familiar with what that really means, just jumping to an assumption about the intent of the paper that I think was not made clear in the title as is.
It would reduce my stress to imagine a world where my grandchildren didn't die from atrophy during the great power outage of 2079, where only the 10% of humanity that weren't reliant on exercise machines exercising their muscles for them, survived.
I can see how encouraging positive relationships could be beneficial for anyone with such a symptom, regardless of figuring out if it's a symptom of pathology (depending on the culture context.)
E.g. given character set a-z, 0: a 1: b 26: aa 27: ab
etc.
I probably had no idea what the interviewee was suggesting and tried and failed to explain my question any better.
I'm maybe not the only one who's experienced bits of 'beaming' with a long time friend or partner?
Perhaps "I have a pretty good idea of what X is thinking" is softer language than "I'm reading X's mind", but I can see how the experience of telepathy is not greatly distant from something that's normal for many people.
Spooky is the word.
This is not true of a lot of twitter ... but the short constraint I think is the only thing that really moves the needle in that direction on there.
[1] https://theintercept.com/2016/11/16/ibm-ceo-personally-offer... [2] https://twitter.com/yogthos/status/799060608561872896
He said a lot of things freely, and a lot of them are interpreted by many as racist or otherwise categorized as bigotry.
I can see the viewpoint that supporting Trump is much more about supporting bigotry than it is about supporting free speech, based on his words and his promises. I have more trouble seeing the viewpoint of the inverse, at this point still.
Would one need a safe word at all if we did?
http://twitter.com/derekbreden