progx
Joined 13 years ago
Karma
798
Submissions
632
Member since
Jun 2
Joined 13 years ago
And how did plain css solve that? You're mixing up a few issues there.
.button {
padding: var(--gap-s) var(--gap-m);
background-color: var(--color-indigo);
color: var(--color-white);
font-weight: 700;
border-radius: var(--gap-s);
&:hover, &:focus {
background-color: var(--color-indigo-hover);
}
}
Fair comparison (i really don't like this too): .button { padding: var(--gap-s) var(--gap-m); background-color: var(--color-indigo); color: var(--color-white); font-weight: 700; border-radius: var(--gap-s); &:hover, &:focus { background-color: var(--color-indigo-hover); } }
;-) .button {
@apply py-2 px-4 bg-indigo-500 text-white font-semibold rounded-lg hover:bg-indigo-700 focus:bg-indigo-700;
}
why not write it like this? .button {
@apply
py-2
px-4
bg-indigo-500
text-white
font-semibold
rounded-lg
hover:bg-indigo-700
focus:bg-indigo-700
;
}Example DeepSeek-V4-Pro (high) needs 10 times more token then GPT 5.5 (medium) and can compete only with the price.
The real price saver are the cache prices, the ting, that nearly nobody has on their radar.