programmernews3
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
If the original funders kept their bitcoin they would be comfortably wealthy. Instead this company has wasted bitcoin that would now be worth billions over the past TWENTY years!
The theory might not be correct
They shake down companies involved with them and give add very little of value. If anything, they are harmful to ecommerce as it makes people more skeptical of reviews
You cant give away money for free and NOT have strong borders.
But we must also get over the idea that we need mass immigration into the West.
The most environmentally friendly thing to do is accept a slow decline in absolute population numbers.
This will mean roads are not as busy, hospitals not full to bursting and the chance to improve the kids to teacher ratio.
Think about the amount of concrete alone that would need to be used to get Africa up to 1st world standards. China used more in a few years than America did in a century. This will have to happen many times over just for the current population level, never mind a growing one!
It is like living in a house and everyone agreeing to cut their energy use by 20%.... while bringing in a new resident every few months.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/3165489/Gardener-arr...
https://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/news/16209261.potato-peeler-l...
The last thing they need is money as that will lead to increased consumption or even increased population growth!
This is a climate EMERGENCY so we should limit their ability to gain money, not ease it