privacyking

No ones cares mate. He's just telling it how it is (how Japanese people see foreigners).

Preside can. I thought spark could too

That’s not backwards compatibility

The signal app does and does the OS once the notification is displayed. The latter is where this issue originates

Have you tried Narjo as an alternative client?

You can have a second or third VPN active if you use a work profile and private space

You still have the same things on android. If an android app requests eg exact location it can refuse to run and there’s nothing you can do. That sort of behaviour is prohibited on iOS and an app won’t be approved if it does that sort of thing. They have to allow declining location permission or at least approximate location

It's not their own phone. It's an OEM phone that will be supported by GrapheneOS by flashing it. Once you do it, there's no reason to believe it wont have the same play integrity issues that it currently has on pixel devices.

No they don't. The current releases for android and iOS both use file based encryption on most supported phones.

A chargeback can be started in minutes.

It has a stable interface on top of Linux, which desktop linux does not have.

Given that their OS requires a pixel phone and google is not releasing a) updated drivers b) updated source code for the latest release

their days are indeed numbered.

As for not being a certified android device and being unaffected. That is not true. There will be chilling effects that result in much less FOSS app development for Android, and whether or not an OS is certified is irrelevant in that regard.

That OEM phone is literally years away.

Well it's more private. Also there's only one proper IPv6 implementation (using GUAs) and most people.cant get one

Thanks