wr
hn
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Back
p
postexitus
Joined 9 years ago
Karma
880
Submissions
405
Member since
Dec 6
View on Hacker News
Recent submissions
Comment · 4 days ago
If that was the business, yes. The first rule of understanding the business is understanding the business model. Not the product. If the business model is a subscription, then you look at the moat. If the moat is not there - you are not that much different from Microsoft Office (which arguably has a larger moat).
Comment · 18 days ago
What was botched about it?
Comment · 24 days ago
burn
Comment · 24 days ago
No, I will pirate autogenerated movies/shows/games. Not paying for that sht.
Comment · 1 month ago
Oldies let's gather here.
Comment · 1 month ago
You are giving a line by line answer to AI slop.
People should be educated about AI gotchas.
Comment · 1 month ago
If apple indeed use shit posting, there has to be several layers of subcontractors in between for plausible deniability. Apple's own comms guidelines strictly prohibits pay-per-review, manipulative, "shit posting" style practices.
Comment · 1 month ago
For 60% of the world, it doesn't make a difference. Do not project your gendered (read: sexist) language constructs onto us.
Comment · 2 months ago
Yeah, through multiple layers of approvals. Not shtposting on hacker news.
Comment · 2 months ago
This, from a 1 day old throwaway account, tells a lot.
Comment · 2 months ago
True - you avoid widespread attacks, but you become super vulnerable for targeted ones.
Comment · 2 months ago
mutt is still being actively developed. Being on command line doesn't make something legacy. Eudora on the other hand had its latest version out 2 decades ago - it lacks even the most basic security updates (starting from TLS, but many more).
Comment · 2 months ago
I understand BBC may not have the technical background to critically assess this approach, but whoever using Eudora (I loved it in 2001 btw) for security should get their credentials removed via King's order. Security through "obsolescence" is no different from security through obscurity - therefore, it doesn't work. Somebody not bothering to look for holes in your software doesn't mean they don't exist - in the age of Claude - I am pretty sure I can destroy your legacy software in minutes.
Comment · 2 months ago
At some point it's going to catch up. Legislation is a very hard process.
Comment · 2 months ago
No - it means you are exposed to - electricity / gas / oil prices. Or Wheat maybe?