positron26

Joined 1 year ago

Karma
83
Submissions
265
Member since
Jul 7
Maximize what people can do. Enable what is more of what wants to be. Open propels by moving starting lines, ensuring all who will attempt may achieve what they are able.

There are itches too big for a single player to scratch. There are things that only a broad alliance of interests can properly build. Bridge these alignments and independence will cross with intent.

The first of these alignments and the one that enables all others is more and better bridges. Build legitimate authority that can employ pooled resources and capabilities towards important objectives that are not rightly the domain of any one of who comprises the alliance.

These are information communication technology problems. Open source is a development model that is critical to delivering the solutions.

https://discord.gg/gxptWX6aCR https://github.com/positron-solutions/MuTate https://bsky.app/profile/positron26.bsky.social

Ping us on GitHub to get in touch.

View on Hacker News

Recent submissions

Comment · 16 days ago
> Can't differentiate the function? Fuck gradients. Here's the entire fucking posterior.

- Monte Carlo

Comment · 24 days ago
It is a great pleasure to return to instinct, leaning back on pre-internet years, on early internet years. I cannot wait to return to a lifestyle where I tend to encounter my peers in great numbers, to only incidentally hear the things we say about "the internet." A greater pleasure still would be to recreate the wonder in a form that is more durable, one where these people who I would identify closely with may not be drowned out, as if the universe became transparent again.
Comment · 24 days ago
The gradient into formalisms is steep and the bottom is deep. These are the worst results anyone will ever see again. The bottom of the internet is also deep, but won't be around much longer.
Comment · 1 month ago
Before the like button, it was more individualistic. Before web 2.0, before global market penetration had hit 10%, it was mainly early adopters.

Who clicks on the clickbait? Who upvotes the garbage? Who actually sees ads and goes to buy what they didn't need? I think we all know.

The window we saw may have been one of an illusive sub-population who is forever on the treadmill trying to get away from the unwashed masses.

Comment · 1 month ago
I suppose we will tell them to vote for better laws?

That last few years of being under 18 can feel completely immoral. "Study hard. Learn skills you will need in life." Meanwhile GPA inflation from unconcerned minders of public institutions will put food on their own table, so accessing anything that will actually move your life ahead will generally require money or ingenuity.

Piracy isn't my religion, but I find it a critical relief valve protecting individual self-determination, especially for young people. Over-centralization of capability into hosted services creates a wall for a problem that needed more relief valves.

Comment · 2 months ago
No, even the humans are dead.

Both the "user configuration" and the library are configuration masquerading as code. One is dynamically evaluated, the other compiled.

I just figure users of Zed know this... so what are we pretending to talk about?

Comment · 2 months ago
Internet is dead.
Comment · 2 months ago
The point of language servers is to support all editors that speak LSP.
Comment · 2 months ago
Lol. In 2015 boring technology is at the hands of your PM spinning up some agent spam. Bury this pile of outdated thinking. Go hard at the most difficult programming you can find or go home.
Comment · 3 months ago
Is that the earthquake in question? No. So your hair-splitting is motivated by what again? Rationalizing HN overreacting so that people can be entertained? Everyone here is "winning" an online argument with zero regard for the false alarm all the karma farming causes.
Comment · 3 months ago
Okay. Let's make every such instance news?

HN is exaggerating to feel close to the action. It's childish.

There is a trench off of Tokyo that is likely to rupture in our lifetimes, and people who have other people to check on don't care about HN's disaster fantasies.

Comment · 3 months ago
8 is serious. 9 is Pacific subduction rupture.

7 is not really top news of the day.

People with friends and family exposed don't really appreciate being false-alarmed with 7s and 6s.

Comment · 3 months ago
Bill Gureley's talk on regulation comes to mind: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9cO3-MLHOM&t=1447s

The reason barking at open source will only get the dog thrown into the river is because there is a whole lot more cumulative power distributed among companies and consumers who don't want two incumbents to dictate which kinds of alternatives can exist.

Note that those rushing to the "all corpos evil" talking points will turn around and advocate delegating these decisions to "the government." This is the same government that they also claim is bought by the corporations. It's also the same government that will enforce the regulatory capture on behalf of the yucky corporation against the broad, diverse interests.

Thinking big vs small while embracing the biggest of the big is some kind of inconsistency that people need to deal with by looking in the mirror and finding some awareness. Nuance. If your problem model is wrong, so is every solution you propose except if your wrong model may get lucky from time to time. Not every broken model is a broken clock. Some broken models cannot admit the right answer ever.

The real dynamic on display here is broad, correlated mass of overlapping interests, big and small. The big pile of people and entities that don't want to be governed by OpenAI and Anthropic can push harder and win the tug of war. You don't have to like your temporary allies all the time, but at least know who they are and when you are aligned.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton