ponector

>> That's what the economy is _for_.

Isn't it to extract every penny from as many people as possible to make few people billionaires?

Age checks does not change the fact they are public setting. Contrary to your point, sometimes it's okay:

>>Under no circumstances is it ok to show porn in a public setting.

Porn cinemas are very much a public settling, no?

Funny how in US it's okay to show to kids drinking alcohol, smoking and using the gun while naked body is a taboo and will harm someone (parents).

Just curious, do you think it will harm kids to go to nude beach or naked sauna?

You don't need to be a middle class to be able to afford electric lights, mobile phones, apples, oranges and grapes all year round.

On the other hand kings had free-range organic grown meat prepared by personal cook anytime they wanted which is a true luxury even today.

You have managers and VPs around who are not lying? How hired such incompetent managers?

Law could be flexible, updated could be done to accommodate changes in the future.

My point is to not let people who are in the final stage of their life to decide how future generation should live.

Is Trump and his administration most competent employees?

I would rather limit not amount of terms, but the age. Not eligible for any kind of elections if you are 60+, both as candidate and as voter.

It's enough to tax at the end of the year and not at the moment when they sell the stock. Your stocks are up 30%? Pay the capital gain taxes for this amount.

Isn't it the benefit? To disrupt power dynamics and be in charge of even more peasants?

Depends on criteria. Flying doors? Boeing wins

That's not true. They are friend with russia.

It's like complaining about absence of job interviews while living in NKorea.

That's a good thing for the world: at least some sanctions are working.

Does it account for diary, eggs, leather?

Why do you think they need to do proper QA? People are going to buy their products anyway.