poleguy
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
I bought this microwave, currently $74.97 and even my six year old could use it. I'm not blind, but I can't imagine why anybody needs all those buttons. I bought this because it saves me a couple seconds every time I use it. It is a better, simpler design, cheaper, and appeals to my favorite design principle: "what can we remove to make this better?" The only downside is that the electronics and mechanical parts are not built to last. But that's generally true of the expensive microwaves too, and they have more things that will break rendering the whole thing useless. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00BGTNY8O/
By straight python I mean things like 'for', 'split', 'startswith', 'find', and regular character indexing.
So for me this post is a solution to a problem that I just avoid.
I had never heard of Actual till today. It looks like it would cover my use case. I'm not sure why I would have switched, though, as YNAB4 still works for me and has no recurring charge and is fully local.
We also ditched simulink because it is very difficult to version control and collaborate with a graphical interface.
Matlab is pushed heavily in the schools so all the engineers knew it and were comfortable with it. Matplotlib and numpy mimicing matlab very closely allowed the transition to be easy. We're not looking back. Only a handful of people still use matlab for their individual work because the python camp hit critical mass and the transition is not hard.
Matlab working to control serial ports, ethernet, visa/gpib instruments, all without the friction of getting extra licenses was icing on the cake. Matlab has a buy the cadillac model: the wheels, doors, hood, gas cap, mirrors are all optional add-ons. Each point causes friction, as only a few people had the whole tool, and therefore nobody could reliably share code.
I'm a electrical hardware design engineer.
I agree, that if Pine64 has enough money to fund a full time engineer, that's a much better use than giving any money to the distros. They should be funding an embedded specialist who should focus on board bring up, because clearly we're not out of that stage yet.
I've built lots of high-volume electronics hardware that is easily as complex as a cell-phone, and the order of development is very important. I'm in the middle of such development right now... Working on software and UI is a dead last on that priority list every time.
It also makes me wonder if the reason it can't fix some of these issues is because it is working around patent issues.
Pure speculation.