podgorniy

His words.... He is bulshitting his way out of this situation

> so my boss does not fire me

That't the key. Not AI.

great stuff, thanks for putting it together

> my life is great. I don’t even understand why anyone cares about equality

Who do you want to educate from that position? You or others?

> Most of that wealth is tied up in assets offering services for americans

Yeah. Like renting a house for a mother of 2 children who will never get her own by selling her labour, while the renter uses her money to buy more units.

Wealth. It's mostly price of the house for median people

> I don't think most Americans have a problem with rich people buying nice houses and nice cars, and using their wealth to pay for private staff.

Think again. The demand from rich to park wealth in X, Y, Z makes prices go up. Just imagine that the RAM prices fueled by AI spending is a housing market. More money rich have, less affordable the life for the rest is.

And don't forget that speed of their wealth growth is way faster than anyone who sells their labour.

Ah. And we did not even talk about "hidden" wealth thingy... All these numbers are official ones.

That will become a point in a court...

Spying on American citizens and going together on Lolita Express to Epstein island...

Point me at anything what _these people do_ that is not a marketing or _confusion_ campaign.

There is something related to meritocracy and sharing back in all these ideas. But i can't pinpoint extractly what is it....

megacool stuff

TLDR: Because reality is way more complex than any of its representations.

--

If person rationalist they

> prioritizes explicit reasoning, logic, and evidence over intuition, tradition, or emotion.

By sticking to this principle one has to describe every cause-effect, every idea from their speech. Reality is way more complex and detailed than any of it's representations. So rationalist can keep detailing and grounding everything they touch in their speech, and then ground grounds and so on. Sticking to rationalist values you have to write more and ground more.

By cutting corners of explanation and reason rationalist's claims they becoming less rationalist and less acceptable by the group, thus less popular. So the more you're rationalist, more popular you are more you have to write. It's natural way of things.

--

Irinically the complete rationalism isn't achievable because Gödel's incompleteness teorem.

> There will always be true statements about symbols that the system can write down, but cannot prove or disprove using its own rules.

They, we all have to draw a logical/grounding line somewhere, either by choice either by incapacity.

You seem did not scroll till the pricacy part of the page

> we really want your data

this is a projection