pj1115
Joined 7 years ago
Joined 7 years ago
Congrats on building this for yourself, I can certainly see the benefit of building writing tools to suit your own needs.
I imagine any potential user of a tool in this state would know what be wary of, but I do worry a little that LLMs have been trained on bad health advice or misinfo, and there will be very limited training data from real patient diagnoses. Even if dangerous data is minuscule in training terms, can good prompting de-risk dangerously bad advice?
However, for younger kids (say, 5-11) I think a separate environment is the best solution. Up to a certain point, parents have more influence on what their child does. For all its problems, most parents I know are comfortable with YouTube Kids because it's the lesser of two evils. I know that my child is going to participate in social media either way, so I want them to do it in a sandbox until the day I don't get a say.
I also don't think it has become much less common in communities where poverty levels have fallen. Anecdotally, my SO is part of a community originally displaced from India and now settled all over the world, where members have disproportionately become very wealthy. Bed sharing is absolutely the norm in those households, much to my distress when we visit her family!
IMO: if your goal is to attract users or to make money, you have too many strong free competitors to be using ads like this, especially if your audience read Hacker News. It's not the right business model. Any amount of time spent making these ads 'smoother' is better spent on the product, because you won't earn enough ad revenue to make it worth it.
If you need revenue to pay for hosting, you'd be better off making it open source or self-hostable.
If your goal is getting feedback, you have to recognise that people are doing it for you, not for them. Don't make them pay you to do it.