pipeline_peak

I’d say this is closer to Blazor

We already have Typescript, I don’t see the purpose.

Foldable iPhones that break and touch screen MacBooks in an age where non professionals do virtually everything in a browser.

What exactly does Apple do different again?

The smartphone succeeded partly because it consolidated things we previously carried separately: a phone, iPod, camera, GPS, and more.

Assuming I’d buy one of these things, transitioning between each use case makes it yet another thing to carry.

Wearable devices at least alleviate that problem.

If the console supported CDs it would cost even more.

Why is Carmack still someone we look up to in the present? I'm aware of what he did in the past but compared to the likes of Torvalds and Bellard he doesn't seem to still be doing anything noteworthy other than yet another AI company.

Total e-waste product.

Everyone knows how badly these things break with moderate use. You’re basically buying with the expectation you’ll have to replace it.

Boring company, lost vision.

Linux had an existing population of Unix engineers who had a strong incentive to build something that could replace the Unix systems they were paying for.

Ladybird doesn’t replace something developers are already paying for, so the incentive to make substantial, high-quality contributions is much weaker.

I’m not really sure what the end goal is with Apple investing so heavily in local AI hardware.

Feels like they’re doing it for the sake of getting with the times, but why would the average Mac User care? I wonder if this an answer the OpenClaw craze.

You mean the Ai that unwillingly pops up on my Google searches?

> I don't think bringing it back will bring back the good old days.

Why does it have to be all or none? There’s clearly a demand for this.

When did the Xbox start looking like a Braun radio?