pindab0ter
Joined 9 years ago
Joined 9 years ago
It seems very easy to just blame this on the voter like this.
Another thing I found is that it is too easy to keep going. I would work for too long and get even more exhausted. It feels rude to just stop a conversation. LLMs don't really care about social norms like that, but it still felt awkward to me and I would worry about losing the context I had.
To help with that, I wrote my own little plugin that reminds me to start winding down at the end of the work day and starts prompting me (pardon my phrasing) to take the off-ramp; to relay any thoughts and todos I still have in mind and put them down to pick up the next day.
This is in no way production ready, but it might be an inspiration: https://github.com/pindab0ter/wind-down
These markets allow you to bet on when the invasion of a foreign country or the demise of a person happens. There comes a point where one bets against someone to die and you will see themselves incentivized to make that happen.
It's addictive. You're fast, efficient, you feel like you're in control. All while you're slowly losing grip.
I love how nuanced your takes are. The biggest challenge of this new programming paradigm is not to see how you can use it to its fullest extent. It is to find out what a sustainable pace is, both sort and long term.
It is hard to understate how difficult that is.
I've tried writing a few blog posts just to mostly learn about writing. Any feedback is welcome. Most posts are written to an imagined audience of people familiar with the topic.
I've also written a very basic terminal, just for laughs. It's nothing special, but I had fun making it.
This seems like a very powerful dataset.
What I think the author (and I) are wondering about, is whether instructions like these might influence not _only_ the final output, but also the way it got there.