Recent submissions

Comment · 8 years ago
Comment · 8 years ago
Wtf man, what's your problem?
Comment · 8 years ago
Meaning that they didn't launch at the right time to arrive at Mars, due to where Mars is in its orbit currently. It'll pass through the imaginary circle around the sun which is Mars' orbit, it's just that Mars will at a different part of the orbit at that time.

But actually, it seems they decided to just empty the tanks and get as much delta-v as possible, and it'll go all the way into the asteroid belt as a result.

Comment · 8 years ago
No, it's a Martian transfer orbit, albeit without Mars at the other end.
Comment · 8 years ago
Actually, no, once the 2nd stage cuts off the trajectory is mostly fixed and we know what orbit it is in. There are, I believe, two more small burns that will be done to adjust the trajectory, but these are more of an adjustment to what kind of Martian transfer orbit it is in. It already has the hyperbolic velocity to leave Earth's orbit, and enter solar orbit with an apogee at the same distance as Mars.

In 6.5 hours SpaceX will have finished everything they wanted to test with this flight I believe, including a number of post-launch checks of various systems and sensors on the payload, and those re-ignition tests of the 2nd stage.

Comment · 8 years ago
What boat?
Comment · 8 years ago
No. Watch SpaceX's twitter feed. It might be a while though.
Comment · 8 years ago
That's the 2nd stage. It's still attached to the payload I believe, so that they can test mid-course corrections to the transfer orbit.
Comment · 8 years ago
What nearby ships?
Comment · 8 years ago
I don't find that surprising. The communication link back is presumably by satellite since it is in the middle of the ocean, and probably a directional antenna because of the high bandwidth. You have any good suggestions for having a reliable connection via directional antenna on a flimsy barge that a rocket is landing on in this middle of the choppy north Atlantic?
Comment · 8 years ago
They were not the same video feed.
Comment · 8 years ago
As I said, I just want the .deb file on the iso.
Comment · 8 years ago
I'm not saying by default. I'm saying have it on the CD.
Comment · 8 years ago
I use containers as lightweight VMs in many places. Generally I see this as a way to get a minimal install that other tools can then configure appropriately, with up to date packages fetched from upstream mirrors directly, instead of installed from CD and then upgraded.

I currently use packer.io to script the creation of a bunch of server images, and for ubuntu I've missed the "minimal install CD" that other distros have. Instead packer has to download a 800MB CD image, in order to install only a few hundred megabytes of uncompressed packages in a bare-bones install, which is then provisioned using some orchestration tool that at its heart uses ssh to login to the virtual machine.

Not having SSH means you need to add in some sort of serial-attach step to manually install sshd, or hook into the install scripts to download sshd as part of the install or whatever. Either way that's additional custom work that is probably common to a great many use cases.

Comment · 8 years ago
Posting here rather than the blog because I don't have a google account:

What about adding sshd to the minimal install? If the purpose of this is minimal installs of containers and cloud servers and such, that seems like quite an omission.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton