phpnodejspwn

I think I love slop now.

This is what they teach in school.

If you read late Wittgenstein or Karl Popper, you will find that science is a useful simplification. Rorty is boring and not useful, but he kills any sort of Realism.

The 3 gigantic holes:

1. It's all language. (Wittgenstein)

2. The edges of systems do not connect with each other.

3. There are exceptions to everything.

I know that might seem a bit generic, but these are the major flaws in the philosophy of science.

I was a true believer too.

If you ever want to learn a ton about science, read Popper. He tortures himself, but he's also scientific meta.

China is paying for these right?

Or did China spark the fire in western countries to care about this stuff?

>Kimi K3.1 Pro shows, even their open weights models are beating frontier models from US companies.

I guess I need to test it but I'd put a polymarket: No.

Their old models were basically unusable for agentic AI. Or at least my uses, and I provide AI services to 8 different industries.

This is a home page basically.....

But yeah I burned 2 days (and more, I have 3 more servers to fix) on the PHP and node js emergency security updates.

I had expected to do software dev, but both exploits came up on the same day.

I am starting to think my job has switched from programmer to IT. It's been months since I wrote a While statement...

2 things to understand about science:

It's useful, not metaphysically real. (Hot take btw) This is called Instrumentalism. The belief that it's real is called Scientific Realism. However over and over again, science can't cover edge cases, and we find better fitting models. The Copernician revolution is a good example of this dichotomy.

2. Academia basically forces you to believe the doctrine or you fail the class. From philosophy to physics to sociology. If you read the philosopher survey, you will find trendy things being quite high. It's a religion in itself.

Bonus 3: Philosophical Pragmatism and Instrumentalism generally solves this, but is intellectually a dead end. There is a reason analytic philosophy continues despite gaping holes in linguistics (late Wittgenstein) that ruin it. But at the same time, best fits might be missing a new paradigm. I wish I could tell people to ask AI to explain Hegel to understand, but I think people need to read it themselves.

Tl;dr: quantum mechanics is the best we have. It's definitely wrong, but it's the most useful we have.

We are using for software development and the law firm at a minimum(sparing you other industries where it's text form level).

SaaS replacement, and some high value engineering software.

As someone who works with law firms and needs private AI, I tried hard to do offline models.

Even with a test server running DeepSeek pro v4, we ended up getting a BAA agreement with Claude to add an additional layer of difficulty.

You are wrongly downvoted, and likely because you used a similie. But local models aren't ready for big times yet.

DeepSeek v4 pro is soooo close. By 2027 they will be usable if you can afford the $200,000 computer.

This law firm can.

Literally don't understand why people use this instead of OpenClaw or Hermes?

The maintainers are close to incompetent and have fragile egos, sure.

But you own your own memory files.

It's seemless to switch from an OpenClaw with Sol to a Hermes with Opus.

Not to mention, the capabilities are at least 2x Claude Code and 8x copilot.

But make sure you download the august version of OpenClaw, after that, the maintainers nerfed it.