philjackson

> Except that the job was never to type code, it was to deliver valuable software. People who can still do that can still get paid by organisations that need that to be done.

It's still the case that fewer people are required so I'm not sure this argument holds up. In the UK at least, entry-level software engineer roles down roughly 27% year-on-year after gpt was launched according to one article I saw.

Can you elaborate on this with real-world examples you've experienced?

I don't know how they're still in business after that. They also had a massive data breach at one point.

> it takes time to spin up a hard drive factory

Very good.

Thanks for taking the time to post these.

If anything, it's going to at least double its traffic this way when people click again assuming they hit back somehow.

They need to build a great product as well as somehow fund the project. Seem like those credentials match the requirements.

> This is what government is for

They're busy selling watches whilst people can still afford them thanks to having jobs.

Trump really has enabled grifting en mass. Any semblance of corporate responsibility out of the window.

Australia finally the right way up.

This looks like a really solid library and a lot of code for free. Many thanks to Dmitry / the team.

Great analogy. We've attempted to produce these systems and every time what emerges is software which makes easy things easy and hard things impossible.

As an aside, I really like the Zed website. Easy to read and pleasant to look at.