peterashford

Ditto. Fun language

That's one word you could use, I guess

See, this is entirely the problem. Your "table stakes" includes stuff I 100% do not want - like async

non sequitur

Go check the Suffragettes in the UK. They literally waged war on men

and thus you show it really is precisely a strawman you've put forward. you assume the worst of the argument, where I do not: hence me saying as much and saying that you made a strawman, because you assume the worst.

I really dont think that describes my point at all

Famously, technology didn't exist before Capitalism. No technology was created under Communism, for example

That sounds like a strawman. What you're arguing against is not how I read the parent

I don't think any significant social change has been bought about by people asking nicely. Votes for women, anti racism, worker's rights, land rights - all hard fought for.

Qualia vs phenomena. Both are real

It isn't

Being pro Palestine in no way implies a "reverse genocide". JFC

As long as that speech doesn't come from CNN or criticise Charlie Kirk, Israel or Trump? I'm sceptical about how much the US really values free speech