pedro_hab

I had a friend in a similar situation, he explained the issue and how he would fix it.

I was baffled and urged him to be careful and assume he was wrong that it had to be wrong.

Anyways, he is still fixing it, getting some people to validate it.

I would think he will save at least hundreds of thousands a year.

But seriously, why a company that spends millions of dollars in an area would not hire an expert to try to save some money in it is beyond me.

I wouldn't be surprised if it got worse.

Most people are on phones now, who uses computers if not for work?

But I guess one could argue using phones would be the same, but even then my personal experience is that most people don't know much about phones either.

I just posted another PBS Spacetime video answering another question.

I feel like a quasi-expert on these subjects because of it. lol

The pw really stressed me, I checked the source code to find what a valid pw looked like.

Pretty cool code btw, it has a rule array that with the error msgs, very easy to follow even tho it was webpacky.

Then I realized the errors were displayed at the bottom of the page.

I don't understand why go after the VPN, I think most people don't use a VPN correctly.

What good is a VPN when multiple apps on your computer are phoning home?

If the law has a suspect IP, couldn't they just ask google, microsoft and facebook what accounts were accessed with that IP?

To use a VPN correctly wouldn't have to use a fresh OS and absolutely not login to any accounts connected to the IP you are trying to hide?

This was pretty bad for me, I tried asking the name of a person references in the PDF and it couldn't find it. I asked who is the claimant in this PDF and it said the claimant was empty.

But if I asked if the claimant name was in the PDF it answered yes.

I am assuming the PDF to Text is not working great here, which I supposed is the whole point.

He probably wrote an medium article on it. lol

I agree with your point here, but I am curious if there isn't space for people to gamble and not be hedged? Speculating naked with the contracts.

I wonder if the lower emissions are really worth it if the car breaks down sooner.

All the electronics and gimmicks to lower immediate emissions at the cost of reliability.

My car, for instance, turns off the engine when stopped, that can't be good for the engine and battery.

If saves a bit of gas but I am sure I'll have to change my battery sooner, not to mention the wear and tear on other components.

yes, WhatsApp used to be great in this regard, you would not get any spam.

Now it's starting to get worse and worse.

I block SMS notifications since I only get spam there (I'm Brazilian, SMS is basically dead here)

I think this is nice, it forces people that want to participate to have skin in the game.

With proof of work there is incentive for people not invested in crypto to mine as much as possible and sell everything.

If a big enough computer is created, someone not interested in crypto can take money away from it, or if the computer is big enough even destroy it, a quantum computer for instance, should make a 51% attack on a network as proof it is a quantum computer.

I know it is unlikely, I myself think is impossible. But the incentive is there.

With proof of stake there is no incentive to do it, a 51% attack is idiotic since you have to buy so much.

It got a lot correctly about me, and put me at 92% normal.

I wonder if you are too far off "normal" it won't recognize you correctly, eg age.

It seems to be down rn

As a developer I am bit ashamed of this question, but I gotta ask:

What consumer apps actually use Neural Engines?

I think something like Photoshop, maybe. But wouldn't it just train a model and use it as regular code?

I'm interested in AI, but it's a joke to me about startups and jargon more often than not.

I feels weird to add this to all chips when I can't see that much usage.

Can you give an example of a country that archived economic prosperity using leftist policies?

I also find your comment on republicans quite wrong, since I don't see many differences between republicans vs democrats.

Both have been running ever increasing deficits, each president tops all previous presidents combined.

You can't really say any of the US policies have liberal.