partomniscient
Joined 14 years ago
Joined 14 years ago
"Building is more fun than breaking" - (may be paraphrased).
Peter Molyneux did some amazing stuff but overpromised and underdelivered a lot. [1]
But some stuff was amazing, PowerMonger was pretty impressive too, but didn't have the succinctness Populous had.
[1] https://www.pcgamer.com/godus-is-deadus-peter-molyneuxs-cont...
A 'clinical' environment, may not be the ideal setting for some patients.
I don't think psychedelics are going to be any different to any other officially approved psychiatric medicine - we don't know enough to know which subset of patients will respond well vs. poorly for psychedelics any more than already available FDA approved (or equivalent similar organisations for other nations) of psychiatric medicines, which in some cases fuck people over for life after a single dose. Large numbers of people have permanently suffered a massively reduced quality of life as a result of a single Invega injection, yet it's still administered regardless.
All I know, is that we don't know enough to know enough.
My personal empirical experience is that I'm wired backwards and have atypical responses to what is now available due to the clinical phase 3 trial majority response, and have personally suffered from supposed experts applying the 'approved' treatments. Even my current psychologist admits they're in foggy territory which makes her better than previous medical professionals I've dealt with.
Advances in physiological medicine changes before and during my lifetime have been incredible. Advances in psychiatric medicine during my lifetime have been a result of capitalist companies gaming systems to create revenue streams rather than improve the overall well-being of humans. The war on drugs just stifled understanding of what options are out there, and what cause-effect mechanisms exist.
It's nice to see independent studies above and beyond the other end of the extremists (e.g. MAPS) contributing to understanding, even though sample sizes are miniscule compared to what we need.
We're currently gambling/playing the probabilistic statistic odds on psychiatric medications without knowing the 'why/how' they work.
We still don't fully understand the mechanisms of action of Aspirin which was first synthesised well over a century ago, and been in widespread use for many decades.
I've moved out of the city and can see most of the stars still, although my eyesight is now failing and I can't see stars I used to...
We are becoming inwardly and selfishly focused as a species and disconnected to the world the alone the rest of the solar system/universe.
Time intensive, but doesn't require much knowledge or pulling hardware.
It was 2 colour, only had 6 or 7 buttons, I could completely operate it without looking at it, and Rockbox gave it the two main features I really wanted: flac support and gapless playback.
The main advantage I have now is I can have my entire (digitised) music collection on my phone - mostly ripped from CD's or purchased from Bandcamp, because it's > 400GB, and I think the Sansa Clip+ only supported 8GB maximum back in the day. Was considering digitising stuff we only have on vinyl as there is a USB output on our turntable, but decided to just leave it in its pure form. Plus recording at 1x speed is almost like going back to the dual cassette tape recorder era and high-speed dubbing was 'special'.
Hardware-wise the clip on the back always broke quickly and then the headphone socket went at some point. Went through about 5 of them before they were obsolete/or on eBay for $100s, but were good enough and cheap enough to keep replacing. One interesting upside of the space constraint was that it made you curate your own music collection, and then opt for a different set (particularly after a few new purchases).
Looks like Rockbox now does a heck of a lot more than it used to back in the day. It's great you've breathed additional life into it.
Even the two Steve's and their Apple company had this issue (as did record companies etc. etc.). Try searching for python now and 'nary a snake to be mentioned.
To be fair I'm equally pissed off that a bunch of different pharmaceutical companies re-brand identical molecules with different names for each company and sometimes for different countries even within a single company.
Sometimes all this naming cleverness or arbitrariness just makes the world more confusing for everyone.
Just a reminder - socialism does not necessarily imply communism, and and implementation of communism thus far has been extremely corrupt.
I lived the in the UK for a couple of years in the early 2000's, the NHS was awesome. It's now a shallow shell of its former self.
Australia where I'm from is trying to imitate the privitisation of health, but my state-local for-profit hospital just went tits up and has been acquired by the government. Partially because a baby needlessly died because profit > caring about human lives, but it wasn't accountable and used tax havens etc. etc.
Fuckin' mess.
I feel for the the UK, because at their best, they probably had the best socialised healthcare system in the world (partly because their population size afforeded them access to medical equipment that other similar countries in Scandinavia etc. can't quite afford).
The US profit motive trumps well-being and healthcare tied to your employment just screws with our heads for most reasonable people. The people that need the help the most are denied it, whilst for the rich - it's built in.
Do you mind telling us what you've pivoted to as a kind of replacement?