pannSun
Joined 4 years ago
Joined 4 years ago
I.e. claiming no laws were violated (hypothetically) is as much a defense of Twitter as claiming TikTok hasn't broken Chinese law.
So.. what? How does that affect whether his ethnicity has a right to exist as a cohesive group, whether its members are better off as part of such a group vs. alone, whether they are better off sharing their countries with other ethnicities with strong group identities, and whether the documented relative demographic decline of his group in many countries [1] is something that group should welcome?
It is so hyperfocused on the people involved, it entirely ignores the underlying facts.
[1] 1970s: 87.5% --> 2020: 61.6% - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_US#Race
What happens in US military expeditions is 10/10, but how they are sold to the US and global audience is 2/10?
Unless they choose wrong, in which case the federal government uses legal and economic measures to correct their choices.
> Next year, Outdoor House will be reinstated, but only because house members promised to refocus their theme on “racial and environmental justice in the outdoors.” Upholding diversity, equity, and inclusion is the first of four “ResX principles” that now govern undergraduate housing. Stanford reserves the right to unhouse any organization that does not, in their opinion, uphold these principles.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demography_of_London#Ethnicity...
That's a nice anecdote. Let's see what happens when we expand the sample size:
Men die earlier but women’s health gets four times more funding (in Australia) - https://web.archive.org/web/20140104031157/http://www.news.c...