pajeetz
Joined 1 year ago
Joined 1 year ago
I guess one clear difference is the lack of a marketing department from something well funded. I recall another HN comment here that said the best business model is to take something people can do already and mark it up by selling the pain points, that could be whats also helping all these auth as a service vendors.
authentication is critical, you shouldn't be outsourcing this stuff anyhow. learn how to harden your box, use cloudflare tunnel and dont store passwords in plaintext.
its really not hard to do and constantly being gaslighted into paying someone to do it for you because everybody else is doing it is just irresponsible.
Gotcha. I'll be sure to pass on the good word.
but GO and pocketbase is on record for supporting 10k concurrent requests per second on low powered VPS
expect to see more of these "post-mortem apologies" from fly.io in the future because it won't be the last
if you are going to haggle over $2/month then you are better off just connecting your raspberry pi with wireguard/cloudflare tunnel on a residential connection
in fact, you can almost get the same thing fly.io does by running firecracker on your own bare metal servers and cheaper too.
I'm afraid the public sentiment towards fly.io has been tainted for good (I can't count how many times they apologized now).
"I'm really shocked at the unprofessional damage control on display here, tptacek is downright belligerent and even going to insult people for wanting reliability from a cloud provider.
Instead he doubles down on the long history of unreliability and downtimes with immature retorts and word plays.
It's unfortunate, I've given him a chance to explain but he repeatedly goes on the offensive and extremely condescending to people who naturally are dismayed by fly.io's recorded history of unreliability."