p0ckets
Joined 17 years ago
Joined 17 years ago
- taking all the books in the exchange (which is technically allowed)
- destructively scanning them (still technically allowed)
- and not leaving any new books in their place (which is frowned upon, but there's no rule that says you have to replace books you take)
- taking all the books in the exchange (which is technically allowed, no rules about how many books you can take)
- destructively scanning them (still technically allowed, no rules about what you do with the book)
- and not leaving any new books in their place (which is frowned upon, but there's no rule that says you have to replace books you take)
Although the recommendation has been 3 meters for a while.
They presumably value that option more than whatever Netflix et al. offered.https://www.theverge.com/2024/2/9/24067496/coyote-vs-acme-am...
But the second proposal - forcing municipalities to write options with unlimited potential losses - is silly. The whole point of the zoning authority is to say "it'll be best for the neighborhood in the long run for there to be some retail shops here", and it makes sense whether you're talking about a lot or the first floor of a building. If the development isn't profitable with the ground-floor retail requirement, then just don't build it.
Some sort of option might work, but it would have to be something like: the municipality can choose to rent the space for a fixed price if it's vacant for long enough. This encourages the landlord to rent it for some higher price.
If they charge different fees depending on address (again, not taxes) then it seems like the intended effect to provide the actual price the consumer will pay.
But it seems those two companies are moving towards touchscreens due to market demand.
You might want to pay for the Made For iPhone certification for some things, but I doubt most cases have it.