owenpalmer

We've already moved away from sites storing credit card information, because the risk of storing it yourself is simply too high. We need to make the stakes higher for other personal information.

> I've concluded that I think I and you are the problem

Oh please. If someone shits in your sandwich, you're not the problem for disliking the flavor of salami for the next 2 years.

erberg

Why would you jump from an ultrasound to chemotherapy? It's not meant to be a definitive diagnosis, it's just an early screening process...

I'm not so worried about the data being useful, I'm worried about the machine actually working.

I mean, with that much data, you may be able to understand under what timeframe a tumor is actually of concern. What's so bad about having some false positives?

I think getting more medical data could prevent a lot of health problems, and collecting it in a relaxed and frequent environment could be interesting. This announcement is honestly just... a bit weird. They're talking about wanting to do a billion scans a month, but they haven't even mentioned what the ultrasound data can tell you about your health, nor have they showed a physical demo of the product. I think the latter is the most important part, does it actually work?

Importantly, the researchers told it to do that specific task.

A law that is not enforced is ultimately a suggestion

> This is not just another incremental release. OpenCV 5 is a major step forward.

Am I the only one that finds this sentence very cheesey?

Why did you write it as "1969ties"?

Smoking has entered the chat

A truly wonderful read

70 months, or 5.83 years