ossobuco

I don't know, socket.io already feels like an unnecessary abstraction to me, and this is another abstraction on top of it. I generally dislike APIs that hide what's happening under "magic" abstractions, plus this seems leaky, as it abstracts on socket.io but requires you to know how it works.

I've been using Odin for the last ~6 months, wrote a 15k loc project and it's been an absolute pleasure. This is my first low level language after 10 years of web dev, and it feels much higher level than it is, while giving you the control and performance of a language like C.

I like pretty much every choice that has been taken when designing the language, except maybe the lack of namespaces, which can be solved anyway with prefixes.

The lack of OOP features is the best part for me, it's rewiring my brain in a good way and I can now also reason much better about RDBMS schemas. Data oriented design is the most helpful approach I've stumbled upon in my career.

It does bounds checking for you but there's not memory safety feature a-la Rust. That's not the point of Odin anyway.

> I wonder what do you think is the solution to this?

Hard to tell, to be honest. Maybe the solution is a presidential republic with a federal government like the USA. Maybe it's to give more control to the EU parlament.

IMO the EU has expanded too much for its weak government model, and has now too many conflicting interests within it. It can't work without a strong central government, and since we can't find an agreement between all members on what that government should look like, we might as well split into multiple smaller unions where members interests converge.

> I even consider somehow that is a mistake to even vote for those if the discussion is not about the EU and the direction we want the EU to go but about how can we protect their own country where country = ANY of the members.

I agree, that's why it doesn't make sense to go through national elections to pick a commissioner, that will also skew the vote in nationalist terms. We have the EU elections to take decisions about the EU, but it turns out the EU parlament is pretty much powerless.

Of course not. The average citizen can't wait to sacrifice their livelihood to show it to Putin.

People LOVE to take cold showers while feeling morally superior to the evil Russians.

I know the EU council appoints a commissioner. Sorry if I don't go on and explain every aspect of how the EU works everytime I write about it.

The point is that we have 2 levels of indirection before we get to the commissioners: national elections in EU usually determine the composition of the parlament, then parlament makes a government (first level). The head of government then appoints a commissioner (second level).

The decision citizens take at national elections is determined by a variety of factors, first of all at the national level.

Given this context, to claim that citizens have any influence on who's part of the EU commission is delusional. If they did, we certainly wouldn't have Von Der Leyen in power, since she enjoys a measly ~34% approval among EU citizens.

Not that voters have any mechanism to punish them. EU elections have very little consequence on the appointment of the comission.

The same leadership that at the start of the sanctions regime claimed Russia's economy was about to collapse is still in power, mostly uncontested. I remember Mario Draghi's condescending and moralizing rhetoric: "Do you want peace or air conditioning?" Turns out we got no peace and the bills still increased by two times.

Notice how those who urge citizens to sacrifice for a higher cause never have to sacrifice anything themselves.

I keep telling you this system is broken, you keep replying that this is how things are supposed to work in this system. I agree that this isn't going anywhere.

> The main problem I see is not the "accountability", as the commissioner is accountable to the council that picked them.

You realize that cannot work when both the council and the commissioner play on the same political agenda? For the council to hold the commissioner accountable it would mean to admit their own guilt. There is no incentive for them to do this, so there is no mechanism for accountability at all.

One example? VDL privately conducting EU business with Pfizer for a vaccine purchase on her phone (illicit) and refusing to provide the text messages to the EU's general court. All while her commission is supposedly based on defending standards of transparency, efficiency and so on.

What about her countless delusions about Russia's economy being about to collapse while all she accomplished was to send EU in a recession?

Or her blindly pursuing a policy of dependence on the USA and hostility towards China, only for the US to dump us as soon as they got a new president?

Please tell me where's the accountability in all of this.

Or why now, given her track record made up entirely of failures, we should trust her to guide the EU into a new very delicate historical phase.

> The allies actually did create a just peace through strength

They won the war, the goal was clearly defeating the axis. Did you have a shower today or did you achieve a just and long lasting personal hygiene through water?

You should at least be brave enough to say it like it is: you want to win the war.

The only problem is that this time the enemy has enough nuclear weapons to trigger a new ice age, so you resort to Newspeak.

> Also, obviously I hope that this time around it’s not too late to prevent facists from burning Europe to the ground before we can defeat them.

For how I see it we got them already in the commission and doing all they can to burn the EU to the ground.

> So what's the deterrent but for Europe to buy its own umbrella?

We already have an umbrella and it costs 3 times as much as Russia's umbrella, while being much less effective. So before burning another €800 billions Iwish we'd put some effort in finding ways to make our current $450 billions of yearly expense work.

Seriously, if we need 10x Russia's budget to keep up with them we've already lost.

On the other hand, if the ultimate goal isn't to make Europe safer, but just to enrich a bunch of weapon manufacturers, then I'd say this plan works perfectly.

Nothing of what I said is incorrect, yet you chose to provide a condescending and pointless explainer instead of addressing my arguments.

Why is VDL ruling the commission if her previous performance was terrible and she isn't viewed favorably by the majority of Europeans?

Why was she appointed by MPEs with secret ballot?

Given the current situation, do you really believe the democratic system in place for the EU provides efficient mechanisms for holding elected officials accountable for their actions?

I'd honestly expect better from the supposed "cradle of democracy".