Recent submissions

Comment · 6 months ago
I am reminded of the Simpsons episode in which Principal Skinner tries to pass off the hamburgers from a near-by fast food restaurant for an old family recipe, 'steamed hams,' and his guest's probing into the kitchen mishaps is met with increasingly incredible explanations.
Comment · 7 months ago
Your attempts to smuggle your conclusions into the conversation are becoming tiresome. Profiling a private company's computer program is not impactful research. The best-fit parameters AI people call scaling exponents are not properties like the proton lifetime or electron electric dipole moment. Rest assured, there remain scientists at universities producing important work on machine learning.
Comment · 7 months ago
>marshalling in the end of human involvement in science

Good riddance! But not relevant in the least.

Comment · 7 months ago
I am not a software engineer, although I do write programs. What is it about digital infrastructure that requires maintenance? In the natural world, there is corrosion, thermal fluctuation, radiation, seismic activity, vandalism, whathaveyou. What are the issues facing the arxiv demanding the attention of multiple people 'round the clock?
Comment · 7 months ago
Universities are also not suited to test which race car is the fastest, but that does not obviate the need for academic research in mechanical engineering.
Comment · 7 months ago
I was substantiating my claims and you were not.
Comment · 7 months ago
I do not agree with your unsupported claim. For example, I would bet no good games have been programmed in Haskell. As far as I am aware, no great games have been made with the Unity or Unreal engines.
Comment · 7 months ago
I do not see how the facts you present call into question the basic logic that as you increase the availability of a commodity, say labour, you anticipate its price to diminish. All of the immigrant workers could be better-compensated and more productive than all of the American workers, and still their presence could drive the price of labour for native workers in that sector down. E.g., if there is a shortage of repairmen certified to fix some medical equipment, introducing a glut of new repairmen who are even more productive will fail to reduce the compensation of the incumbents only in exceptional circumstances.
Comment · 7 months ago
Comment · 7 months ago
I am not convinced that that matters. Great games have been made with Godot (Cruelty Squad) and GameMaker (Sexy Hiking), or with no engine at all (Minecraft, Cave Story).
Comment · 7 months ago
You gave the guy prompting the bot the respect of reviewing his 'work' and he just gave you more LLM output, lol.
Comment · 7 months ago
The power of a judge should never exceed scolding and recrimination.
Comment · 7 months ago
Thanks; I missed that and almost sullied my mind reading an argument formulated by a potential adversary to the United States of America.
Comment · 7 months ago
Your prose is poor so it is no wonder. Half the words you use are superfluous, some are nonsensical, and you beg the question.
Comment · 8 months ago
The Economist only wants what's best for China. (As the article is paywalled, do they discuss the positive externalities of this glut or only the difficult labour market?)

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton