orangedog

The poster referred to themselves as the author. They created it, which is good enough for me.

I don't feel there's that much of a difference. It certainly isn't "awful" to me.

I don't think there's anything wrong with this website, just some people hate slop.

You're coming across as rather unkind in this thread and it does the project that you mentioned that you are working on a disservice.

Don't bother commenting if you aren't going to engage people who disagree with you.

Why bother commenting at all if you are just going to act in bad faith?

I'm asking genuine questions and you don't have answers.

Ok, and they created something new to do that. Why is that bad? HN is content marketing for YC but you still use it.

What commons are they exploiting?

IRC didn't and hasn't meaningfully evolved the features Discord has, which is why people use Discord.

You're getting downvoted probably because it isn't a serious suggestion. IRC is missing features and you don't have a meaningful reason to make it illegal.

For the record, I use IRC.

They have to decide what "human values" their model is going to be adapted towards. Ultimately, they have to decide that, even if they choose an outside source. How else are they supposed to do it?

I don't understand. Human values are not universal, don't they have to be the arbiter? Isn't that all that statement is saying?

> Your comments in other threads suggest an devotion to the frontier labs.

I don't use these models much I just don't like unfair criticism.

> In another thread when I suggested they lied to investors and that constitutes securities fraud you questioned it in an overly dismissive manner.

I'm confused, are you posting under two identities?

The user Frieren claimed that this post constituted securities fraud. To which I responded: "You're claiming this is securities fraud?"

Is that dismissive? It was a genuine question, I don't get how it's even accurate say that they are lying in the post and I especially don't get how it is securities fraud.

Your post doesn't have anything to do with the blogpost. Once again, I'm not against criticism just unfair/weak criticism. I don't think it helps anything.