orange_county
Joined 11 years ago
Joined 11 years ago
This is a supply issue and thus why people should be considering joining YIMBY Action.
Also won’t prices differ by location? So many questions.
On the flip side, I wish the fed gov't would regulate vehicle sizes such that we don't have such an arms race for bigger cars.
We really should be upping the minimal liabilities for cars. That might be the only thing that would really push our local gov't to invest in safer driving infrastructure along with alternative transit options. Vision Zero in many cities have been extremely lacking in comparison to our european counterparts.
The city should have just rezoned many parts of the city a long time ago for mixed used. But instead the city and its residents has always fought against new housing. It’s only because of new RHNA mandates that they are required to zone for new housing. This is going to be a win for NIMBYs.
I hope the cities involved will rezone other areas especially in single family neighborhoods such that we can get more housing when interest rates drop. There is a lot of demand still for housing and there are policy tools that can be leveraged to encourage more housing to be built.
Unfortunately with the rise of the NIMBY movement, it will only get worse before it gets better.
I still use it for various things albeit maybe only 10% of the time.
And when cities do decide to upzone, they tend to centralize high density towers in one part of the city.
There are countless studies on why suburbs are just one big ponzi scheme. Strongtowns is an advocacy group that is trying to show more light into this issue.
Most of the tax revenue comes from downtowns where there are more density and more economic activity. Meanwhile a lot of the infrastructure cost are sunked into the suburbs that contribute little to the total tax revenue. The situation is even worst in California due to prop 13.