omega3

He posted a couple of replies and closed the issue, then this thread was posted and he went back and posted an apology and the fix.

> My replies there were more dismissive than they should have been. My apologies.

I’m curious what made you change your mind, perhaps seeing this getting traction on hn?

Huh, everything is digital apart from the needle arm of the rev counter?

Make a fantastic game, 95+ on metacritic, no mistakes

> I was frustrated that when I posted questions about integrals on Math.SE, I often received comments like "Why is this interesting?" or "What makes you think that it may have a closed-form solution?"

Not surprised that the rotten culture of unhelpful gatekeeping at Stack Exchange extended beyond stack overflow.

I disagree, LinkedIn has the best memes on the internet.

Hey SSX, its your cousin Niko, let’s go bowling.

What's clear is that there is a lot of hype around LLM and people who were previously valued for their IC are now in the business of shilling.

Why misadventure?

Contrary to people here who feel the price increases, reduction of subscription limits etc are the result of the Anthropic models being more expensive to run than the API & subscription revenue they generate I have a theory that Anthropic has been in the enshittification & rent seeking phase for a while in which they will attempt to extract as much money out of existing users as possible.

Commercial inference providers serve Chinese models of comparable quality at 0.1x-0.25x. I think Anthropic realised that the game is up and they will not be able to hold the lead in quality forever so it's best to switch to value extraction whilst that lead is still somewhat there.

I'm not convinced, Kimi 2.5, GLM 5.1, Minimax M2.7 are all fraction of the price and still make money on inference.