obpe

I assumed it was propaganda designed to remind American's of their settler heritage thus legitimizing the process.

"a report from the company", powerful evidence. As long as the corporation profiting, while their employees spy on you, says it's fine...

It should be the end of Zionism.

It seems the entire premise is that Social Media is what is actually bad for us but going to office would help people be more tolerant... I don't think so. The vast majority of people do not work from home remotely. And the intolerance in our society was well established before remote work was common during the pandemic.

I personally really dislike when someone proclaims how society should be from the own personal anecdote.

If AI writing was good enough then they wouldn't be able to tell. Also, some people lying on social media won't change any minds about whether they will be fired.

I believe it is largely Meta pushing this so they can more accurately track people over 16.

Just another reason to never use AI.

I think the real problem is rich people thinking that their lives are "amazing" and can not understand, because their livelihood depends on it, why some one could possibly have a different opinion about their own life. What do you mean you can't afford rent, planes have Wifi now! You haven't got a meaningful raise in 5 years, but ChatGPT 5 was released, it's a step improvement in functionality! Not a single thing that is amazing impacts me nor has improved my life. But I guess rich people flying around can stream Netflix, we truly are living in a Utopia.

This is true for every obesity intervention.

Because high blood pressure can have many transient causes: caffeine, exercise, stress, dehydration, even high salt intake. Further, other diseases can also cause high blood pressure, such as diabetes, and Hypertension (high blood pressure) is also it's own disease.

That's because the number is 0 (zero).

I am truly sorry for the situation you find yourself in.

Meta makes far more money from scammers than they will from you so it's in their best interest.

Every assertion I checked from that article is false. So there is no evidence Wikipedia has a bias.

I stopped reading after the umpteenth paragraph not mentioning the book.