nyx_land
Joined 5 years ago
Joined 5 years ago
So I can't blame the devs for just expecting the user to sort their movie files beforehand (maybe with a different tool (except there aren't any for movie files as far as I know)). It's the kind of thing that there aren't any good solutions to. Not sure how Plex manages to guess movie files better than Jellyfin (I just ended up stealing JF's regexes for my thing) but since it's proprietary there's no way of knowing what regex magic they use.
As it stands, smartphones are the worst of both worlds though: the form factor of what is essentially a legacy communication device, but none of the human interfaces necessary to make it useful enough to really take advantage of all its computing power (and often also its software cripples the device unless you're running a custom android ROM). What people hate about smartphones isn't that they're constantly plugged in but that they have a device on them all the time that is basically designed to turn the user into the ideal consumer: a passive addict with no attention span. If it was more common to have access to portable hardware that is designed to empower users being creative and productive, maybe it'd be a different story.
But then again, I think most human beings probably want exactly what they're getting with smartphones and are miserable and alienated at the human condition itself of being so susceptible to seeking out low effort short term dopamine feedback loops.
This isn't framing the problem the fediverse is solving accurately. What fedi solves isn't not trusting anyone, because it's not a fully P2P network. Rather, it's more about having accountability for the services you use. With a massive centralized social media platform like Twitter where it needs to effectively scale up to be able to accommodate the entire world, it's impossible for a service like this to exist without either being run by a government or a corporation. In the US, the two are more or less the same anyways since we've outsourced most of our infrastructure to the private sector and have been doing that for decades. And in the case of a private entity controlling one of these services that need to scale massively, it's effectively impossible for them to not be incentivized to do all the things that make people not trust them -- mining users' data, etc.
On fedi, you know who your server admins are; they're human beings that you can message if you have a dispute with another user, or there's an issue with the service itself, or whatever. If an instance admin does something shitty, they can be held accountable for it and can have their reputation ruined on fedi, which isn't a perfect system since it leads to things like people being defederated unjustly, but I would say it's far more scalable socially to have a patchwork of different small to medium sized servers run by individuals or teams of people rather than faceless corporations that largely automate all of their user-facing interactions (algorithmic bans and support) where it's basically impossible to hold them accountable for anything unless you have millions of dollars to burn in court.
It is true that centralization/decentralization are implementation details for solving a problem, but this is a case of technological solutions not being sufficient for cultural problems and vice versa. Fedi, for all the problems I have with it, is however closer to striking a balance between solving problems on both of these fronts because it returns the internet to being a community-driven network that has its own culture, and has more ability to handle bad actors or failures in the network with federation as opposed to earlier eras in the internet where for example everyone was using their own separate forums and the centralization of the internet onto social media platforms was really an inevitable consequence of that structure of the internet.