novosel

You have gotten me in Meta's embrace

A dull knife you cannot control, is slides across the surface, it can slip. Try cutting onions with a dull knife. You will cry yourself out of the room.

Good Sir, economics is never supposed to work out.

And hence, Dickensian invention of cliffhanger at the end of installment. Narrative push and pull that you can feel when you read it in a book.

True, true. But maybe somewhat reductive? What about complexity? The one arising from the growing code, and the other in the brain using the language? I feel new languages try to strategize in the domain of complexity management.

I really wanted for it to be a robotic tongue drumming all the ambient hits.

Being raped.

I agree, Dasher is a beautiful piece of software design.

I am ok with the long-form reply. We are all sentient, one can scan for the information or insights that are valuable to him/her. On the other hand, I dislike when information is withheld from me.

I was researching different input methods, and stumbled upon Dasher. What I like the most is:

  - the fact that I can write with one hand (like with a fountain pen, remember those?)

  - right edge of the interface is literally The Library of Babel of J. L. Borges

[Drinks] O true apothecary! Thy drugs are quick. Thus with a KISS I die. [Dies]

((One W. Shakespeare Romeo and Juliet.))

Excuse me, maybe I am not getting it, why is this downvoted?

I came here to suggest Dasher to OP also.

Yes, I understood your argument, and your emphasis is on the point there.

I am simply asking in what sense did Claude read all those books. I am sorry if I have hijacked the disscusion.

edited: spelling

It is interesting to me that your emphasis is on _lot_, and not on _read_.

Frugal?

There is no deep formal math in AI. It is a game of numbers.

All deep formal math is a boundary to a thing.