Recent submissions

Comment · 5 years ago
Can you prove your statement by providing an example please?
Comment · 5 years ago
That’s because the shortages you experienced were real. The shortages we’ve had over the pandemic are greatly exaggerated by our trash tabloid media which vice is a prime offender.
Comment · 5 years ago
Ivermectin? Actual studies now prove it effective. YouTube banned people for talking about it and people died because of it. How’s that?

There are too many one sentence questions on these issues of censorship. I would say they provide no value to the conversation.

Comment · 5 years ago
what do you mean “what damage was done”?
Comment · 5 years ago
What sorta shit conversation is this not trying to have? Your question doesn’t even make sense here.

Collect that fucking .25cents tho bro

Comment · 5 years ago
Ahh yes you mean like having Peter dazick or whatever his name is fact check covid source material on Facebook? When his eco health alliance funded it? Yeah. Fact checks alright. Laughable.
Comment · 5 years ago
Well. Count me up as one who was a die hard Bernie supporter who has made a very hard right turn as my former home (as a progressive Dem) seems to be arguing in favor of censorship at every turn.

If you want more people like me keep thinking you can stifle speech on the internet.

Comment · 5 years ago
What exactly were the ethics behind removing any reference to wuhan institute of virology being the source of covid?

Ethics to you does not mean ethics to me.

Comment · 5 years ago
I thought we just heard for 6 months that private companies can ban whoever they want…
Comment · 5 years ago
It’s not a privacy minded standpoint. It’s the god damn 4th amendment.
Comment · 5 years ago
Hell go back and check out what happened to quest over the carnivore shit. “Our” government has been pulling this shit since the 90s.
Comment · 5 years ago
You’re right - this gated world didn’t need to happen. Sure would have been nice if American scenarists and eco health didn’t continue gain of function research after it was outlawed in the us.

So uh what about this?

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/27/10/21-1427_article

If it’s true the vax causes antibody dependent enhancement and that YOU, as the individual who took the experimental therapy, is producing higher viral loads would you take your punishment if you where responsible for thousands of deaths?

Also - what do we call people who are currently vaccinating their children yet refuse the experimental therapy? Clearly they’re not antivaxxers.

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton