norman784

I suppose it is just the convenience of having an opinionated app that works with agents out of the box, tmux could be more powerful but similar to vim vs vscode, you need to tune it in.

> The amount of great games under $20 that you can get these days is overwhelming

I think that's the problem, there are too many to choose from, where you end up overwhelmed and ends up choosing none.

tsrs also has an LSP, so will be interesting to see how much memory it consumes vs tsgo.

I'm tired of all the new tools that comes out every day, but I would say, this is basically the Vite team and if they implement it with Vite+, then I'm all for it, less decisions about tooling to be made, one config file, etc.

Windows and Linux do the same, they store the data in the user home folder. So not sure if your argument stands, maybe Android is different in that regard, but also it's easier to back up the data this way.

> Worse compatibility with the millions of Android apps already out there.

Most of the apps on Android and iOS aren't necessarily useful.

The only reason to choose Node is because it's boring, is a long lived project and I think it will outlive Bun and Deno.

With Vue, you require each library you use to be Vue specific, Nuxt UI, Vuetify, etc, while Svelte works seamlessly with vanilla JS libraries, also Svelte feels more like vanilla HTML/CSS/JS with some sparkles over it.

Other advantages of Svelte over React/Vue is that it does not require a Svelte specific library or wrapper, you can use vanilla JS libraries and it works seamlessly. I consider that as plus, you can old good old Chart.js, Ag-grid, etc without any wrapper, I tried some libraries with React/Vue that had wrappers for multiple frameworks, and most of them were painful, because each framework/library has their way to do things that collides with them, while Svelte is basically vanilla web tech with some sparkles over it.

Yeah, but it confuses me, I read left to right, so if they put GPT-6 and $0.20 first, I would assume that's the new pricing, they should make it clear, not confusing.

Yeah, how they put, is confusing to me, they should have put that table instead of what they have right now in the article.

Is GPT-6 50% cheaper?

> GPT‑6 Luna vs. GPT‑5.6 Luna | $0.20 → $0.10 | $1.20 → $0.50 | 50% cheaper

I can read it as follows (below), meaning that GPT-5.6 is 50% cheaper.

- GPT-6 = $0.20

- GPT-5.6 = $0.10

I would think about if it was at least Go or Rust, but yet another interpreted language built on top of other abstractions? No thanks, I had my fair share of Xamarin, React Native, Electron, Tauri and TBH building native is the best (more work, sure, but at least when you have bugs or issues, it's easier to find solutions), with abstractions you need to deal with bugs on each layer.

Also in the era of AI, sharing native code is easier than ever, just compile down to WASM for the web and for the other binary.

And different price tag

Not only Lisp, but Javascript and Ruby (AKA dynamic languages) devs also rely heavily in REPLs, for me at least the reason is that you don't know what value a variable holts, so you need to inspect them somehow, with typed languages you have less reasons to reach such tool.