nopenopenopeno

That and collective withholding of the labor power of the working class (strikes) are the only 2 ways any national ruling class has ever been meaningfully opposed. Take your pick and do everything you can to make it happen first.

>We like to point the finger here in the US about how corrupt Russia, Ukraine or any other country is but we’re no Saints.

Our finger-pointing is not due to coincidence; it's due to conflict. Specifically, the conflict is between the inherent interests of competing national ruling classes.

>The executives of these companies should have their addresses listed as well as all the politicians on the take and let the people do with them what they will.

The executives of these companies answer to the company owners (corporate boards) who collectively control the state by leverage of capital. Because we are a capitalist society, the owners of the capital have the power. Any apparent exceptions will always be withheld from accumulating meaningful influence, short of revolution by the working class.

In other words, this is not a matter of faulty policy. It is a conflict of power. Let's discuss it as such.

And we should criticize historical communist leaders accordingly, instead of criticizing socialism whole cloth.

The quote is, though.

It would be slightly easier to take you seriously if you could spell correctly.

What are you talking about? Opioids are already literally legal and regulated.

Did you even read the rest of their comment?

If you disagree, then make an actual argument for the content of your position. This subjective word policing is pathetic and unconvincing.

At least a few explicit examples would be a good place to start. I look forward to it.