noobquestion81
Joined 7 years ago
Joined 7 years ago
They are the best looking camera glasses I have seen - they look like standard wayfarers. But then again, I thought the same of the first gen Spectacles (the newer ones are hilariously dumb looking), so we’ll see. $300 is only like twice the price of normal wayfarers, so not bad there either.
Disadvantages AFAICT: - standard Facebook trust issues - no private audio, AR, or motion sensing - not waterproof (wtf, but at least they’re not horribly expensive and I guess just become normal wayfarers when they get wet) - no “click to save the last 30 seconds mode” (maybe with a Orange LED color) like my PS5 has :)
Knowing nothing else, my guess is this was certainly exploited, as you can grab off-the-shelf exploits for the runc exploit.
My 2c; I did see their remote work demo and thought it was kind of cool, although (anecdotally) coding in a virtual screen tends to give me headaches. But until the headsets arent heavy, expensive, and silly-looking or require goofy paddles I do not think the VR metaverse will be gaining any mass traction.
Personally I have found current VR is fun for some games and tedious for everything else. The wow factor of a large expensive facial protrusion with a screen and gyro was gone by the time Oculus was acquired. What followed was a lowering of price, allowing for 4-5x more users per year to be disappointed. And Facebook has more or less failed at all their hw offerings thus far despite much PR, right? I dont see that changing. They should stick to monetizing your information IMO, they’ve been able to make that highly efficient and it doesn’t cost $800 for the end user or leave large imprints on their faces.
Like op said, just tack on -f and https://, and remember to do this in the future.
Absolute trash OS, sorry.
1. Encrypted onion routing on layers that betray source/dest IP. 2. eSNI on all TLS connections. 3. Privacy-focused DNS.