noen

Really well written article, thank you!

This article reminds me of my early days at Microsoft. I spent 8 years in the Developer Division (DevDiv).

Microsoft had three personas for software engineers that were eventually retired for a much more complex persona framework called people in context (the irony in relation to this article isn’t lost on me).

But those original personas still stick with me and have been incredibly valuable in my career to understand and work effectively with other engineers.

Mort - the pragmatic engineer who cares most about the business outcome. If a “pile of if statements” gets the job done quickly and meets the requirements - Mort became a pejorative term at Microsoft unfortunately. VB developers were often Morts, Access developers were often Morts.

Elvis - the rockstar engineer who cares most about doing something new and exciting. Being the first to use the latest framework or technology. Getting visibility and accolades for innovation. The code might be a little unstable - but move fast and break things right? Elvis also cares a lot about the perceived brilliance of their code - 4 layers of abstraction? That must take a genius to understand and Elvis understands it because they wrote it, now everyone will know they are a genius. For many engineers at Microsoft (especially early in career) the assumption was (and still is largely) that Elvis gets promoted because Elvis gets visibility and is always innovating.

Einstein - the engineer who cares about the algorithm. Einstein wants to write the most performant, the most elegant, the most technically correct code possible. Einstein cares more if they are writing “pythonic” code than if the output actually solves the business problem. Einstein will refactor 200 lines of code to add a single new conditional to keep the codebase consistent. Einsteins love love love functional languages.

None of these personas represent a real engineer - every engineer is a mix, and a human with complex motivations and perspectives - but I can usually pin one of these 3 as the primary within a few days of PRs and a single design review.

Microsoft rarely did or does anything first. They are typically second or third to the post and VC is no different.

Most people don’t know or realize that Git is where it is because of Microsoft. About 1/2 of the TFS core team spun out to a foundation where they spent several years doing things like making submodules actually work, writing git-lfs, and generally making git scale.

You can look for yourself at the libgit2 repo back in the 2012-2015 timeframe. Nearly the whole thing was rewritten by Microsoft employees as the earliest stages of moving the company off source depot.

It was a really cool time that I’m still amazed to have been a small part of.

Basically all XR devices put the focal plane at between 0.5 and 1m away. It’s a very very complicated reason why, but this is unlikely to change for a very long time.

A team in my org worked with Jet for 2+ years to help y’all scale.

It was interesting seeing the biweekly status updates, they basically all started with “This is how Jet.com broke Azure core services this week”.

As much as it sucks, this was a deliberate strategy all the way from Satya - every employee knew Azure was a joke, but the only want to actually fix shit was to get internet scale customers to break it daily and weekly.

It has been on life support for a long time AFAIK. I designed Visual Studio Online (the first launch of AzDO) - and every engineer, PM, and executive I worked with is either in leadership at GitHub or retired.

Thin client - no big deal. $30-300 per month per device? LOL. Dead on arrival.

Similar story here. 20+ years experience in leading dev, pm, and UX teams. Launched multiple 0-1 market leading products, worked with dozens of Fortune 500s.

Applied to more than a hundred positions - one phone screen and one interview.

Then I just went to my large network and within a week I have multiple opportunities - companies creating positions so they can hire me.

Spoke to a number of colleagues in recruiting and who are hiring for their teams - the number of ghost jobs, and frozen but posted positions is staggering. Something is fundamentally broken in the hiring world today.

He didn’t keep the lights on while waiting for new development to take off. He actively lost 40+ billion dollars on horrible acquisitions, and actively stifled internal innovation to ensure existing product lines weren’t threatened.

On the sales side he streamlined Microsoft into a single monolithic sales motion that killed dozens of products before they started because the target customer/market didn’t fit the EA model.

This included Azure that took nearly a decade after his departure to unwind so the sales force could actually sell consumption based products and services.

I honestly can’t think of anything substantially positive he achieved in his tenure other than promoting Satya and Scott G and a handful of others.

All of the contemporary media reports don’t know about the laundry list of near sighted, anti competitive, anti innovation shit he put on the company.

Yeah the team running the platform internally was amazing to work with and did incredible work with just a handful of resources.

The efficiency for scale of mediawiki is hard to beat.

Nice!! Made my day. Not sure how they can move off of it, partly because there’s no alternative that has a fraction of the capability

This is why McDonalds literally spends tens of millions of dollars per quarter giving away free food to attempt to get more people to just use the app.

Their plan longterm is exactly this - have a robot box with a window that only accepts orders through your phone and removes all humans from the process.

You might be surprised how many people absolutely hate using apps, and do not want to interact with a business through a mobile phone. Older folks especially, but also there is a large portion of the population that only use technology when necessary.

We build a heuristic model from scratch. We used BART for some NLP bits and Azure speech to text for the basic mic -> raw text. My memory is very muddy on this bit as I didn’t work on the algo portion of the project, I was working on the UX workflows and interaction / conversational workflow design and validation.

Fun fact, McDonalds menu is a graph database that tracks every single ingredient as purchasable entity. You can order damn near any combination of elements and they will sell it to you - want 32 pickles and the bottom piece of a bun with a chocolate chip cookie on top? No problem.

And every promotional item and name ever put on sale is persisted in the menu forever.

Yes, but not in the ways you think. Humans can do about as good a job as a computer in understanding poor audio quality in context, but the compute needed for the latter, in realtime, is pretty substantial.

As the commenter says below, a human can intervene in many more ways when equipment malfunctions or customers have special needs that an AI just gets blocked by.

There are literally hundreds of edge cases where a voice powered drive through just stops working, from high winds to pouring rain, to thick accents, broken equipment, out of stock or seasonal items not available. Just a few of the ones I encountered personally in the wild tagging 15,000+ orders.

Edge compute requires field IT for servicing. You can hire 3-4 employees for the price of a single field service specialist.

Servicing industrial edge compute is insanely expensive for B&M businesses. This is a big part of why so many companies have spent the last decade offloading everything humanly possible to public cloud workloads.