nlittlepoole

what are the properties of the table? is the whole table 2B rows or is that the amount of row updates/inserts that happen per period (day, week, month)? We do handle a lot of large table volumes on both our products already, but there will be cost tradeoffs the larger the data volume and lower the latency you try to target.

Yeah exactly. Wouldn't it be easier to make it self reported but use a mechanism to incentivize accurate market prices. Like enforce that the owner can't sell for more than x% the reported amount and rents are capped based on the reported amount. Use of the property as collateral has to match the reported value. You can only be insured for value up to that reported number. Lots of things the state can do to create that incentive.

You need a viable Proof of Human/Personhood system and afaik one does not yet exist.

I agree with your take here. I have a partner that anyone in this thread would label as a #1 but my two siblings are essentially on the same plane of intimacy. If my partner left my life for whatever reason, I'd still have my siblings and while losing someone is hard it wouldn't destroy me because of that support. Its a fairly normal dynamic in my family. I had two uncles who lived together their whole lives, even through relationships that didn't end up working out even though they had children. My grandmother lived in the same apartment building as her brother for 30 years and her other two siblings lived in the same neighborhood. Her husband (my grandfather) died a few years into their marriage and her siblings (who never got married) always fulfilled the role that a partner would play.

> The modern Luddite, I think, doesn't necessarily "hate" looms, or their inventors. They just don't have any faith that those necessary compensations you describe will ever happen, or at least not quickly enough to save them. Perhaps the government is convinced by exactly that argument above. Or at very least too apathetic (or financially tangled) to fight it.

Agree

> We all act along the axes where we can affect something, effect something. Smashing looms is a fool's errand, but sometimes that's all the power you feel you have.

However I think what's fascinating about this is it requires believing you can't change your skill set to something else. Sometimes I don't think its as simple as feeling empowered, but also fear and anxiety about change.

I agree with your premise but ultimately its the responsibility of governments to manage how society distributes what is produced. In the US at least, it seems most of the tension here comes from the fact that we've decided that if you are not doing "work", then you don't "deserve" food, shelter, or healthcare. Trying to stop automation always seems like a fools errand because there is simply too much incentive to automate.

are you guys only sticking to Ethereum? Any plans for Algorand support?

Can we get any of Iceberg/Delta/Hudi that isn't terribly complex to setup? Like configurable completely from Standard SQL via the CREATE EXTERNAL TABLE syntax.

100% agree.

I partake in this trade. There are other DeFi markets than Aave with better rates (6% to 9% range) for borrowing Tether. I also don't only use one market or one chain to hedge a bit smart contract risk. I also didn't sell Tether and just hold cash. Maxing out my I Bonds allocation and then buying treasuries has offset the interest on Tether such that I've been slightly net positive for the last 18 months on my position. This is all gambling money, no money I actually need day to day is tied up in this and my retirement/savings are invested an a traditional portfolio of stocks/bonds/real estate.

Doing the exact same for some side projects. It's been a delight.