nickalaso
Joined 6 years ago
Joined 6 years ago
Why don't you buy my overpriced hardware, then let me use the overpriced hardware you just paid for in exchange for extremely overvalued shares that border on funny money, so I can then take the same overpriced hardware you just bought and sell it at an extremely overpriced rate to some inference provider.
When the inevitable happens I really do think it going to be pretty bad this time.
But when it did work it was making steady progress on a vague git issue backlog and actually following instructions to carefully break into atomic sub issues and carefully assign.
That one will be fun to see.
If fable is the best we got everybody still has some more time till the apocalypse I think.
Wonder how many times we get to see it flip back and forth before this bubble explodes.
Especially considering its all for the privilege of getting half way through a standard dev task before it just bricks out of nowhere on the 'safety' guardrails because of a keyword that often appears to be created by the model itself?
I've been running Fable on a few different projects and just by itself on same codebase it'll brick, so looks like it can just straight up create its own demise.
I do not think any of us yet have to worry about being 'replaced with ai' if the 'premiere ai company' still can't put out their flagship product with minimal qa. This is embarassing.
And the short 7 day window for subscribers is just taking the piss. So happy I'm paying hundreds per month to be free qa for anthropic, god knows they need the help.
Mona barely thought about profit because you didn't update the many configurable levers to increase the code loops generation related to profit.
You can update the sys prompt, perform basic harness changes, such as sys prompt optimization, toolset optimization, tool description optimization, 'multi-agent' and 'composed-agent' flows, etc. etc. Get it to do whatever you want.
Its like if someone wrote an article about how their windows 95 pc they named paul didn't think about finances too much because they never installed quickbooks on it.
I'm not really sure who this article is meant to appeal to.
Even now, after all the development, if you can somehow get Claude Fable to run without bricking due to the safety 'features', whatever it imitates is still a poor replacement compared to the slew of available open source code repositories that it stole its training from.
Problem is humans are lazy and its really easy to just yell at a chatbot until you get some slop that mostly does it.
Its meant for a Windows machine using ollama but I'm sure anyone who wants to mess with it can point claude code at it to convert it for your own operating system and requirements. After install you can ask it to do something with "vibe 'create me a poem about cheese in cheese.txt'" its workspace is by default the directory the cli was located in when you called it.
I think it is very interesting that: A. Removing the section in question seems to greatly fix performance on the benchmark candy question. B. Removing the section does not appear to change at all mean reasoning token use or the 512 reasoning token hit problem