nick49488171

I'm not a psychopath but how are we supposed to fix the deficit without something like DOGE that can cut programs.

Authoritarian?

The gyroscope and battery should not be getting exposed without permission. That seems unexpectedly invasive, and I'm in tech.

Also we should disable referrer field.

The interface is great for what it does though. I still use ti-83 interface with the calculator app on my phone.

My brand new Pixel phone several years back, I was so excited it was IP68. Took some photos splashing around in water, not more than a foot or two. It died in minutes.

That would have been absolutely horrible

No probably not

Eventually we will rediscover the Harvard Architecture for LLMs.

Arc AGI 4 can be Chip's Challenge!

I would make the same argument about bicycles then. What is the point of spending taxpayer money providing services for such a dangerous activity?

The counter argument is this: if the chance of dying is 2% to make a historic mission, then people should be able to make that choice. What's your counterargument to this statement?

As for your hazards Microgravity can be counteracted with a centrifugal living environment.

Radiation can not be mitigated effectively yet other than throwing mass at the problem. But if someone wants to launch enough mass that's on them.

I was not arguing about the hazards of space travel. Of course it is hazardous. I dislike the article because his conclusion is more dangerous to society than any hazardous activity: "something is dangerous therefore nobody should do it." And he makes no arguments to support this conclusion.

Fixed pie fallacy.