nhinck

~20 million hours per hour... crazy amount of output. Also if you assume that people only watch while awake then it's 1 in ~250 awake people.

hit detection for hovering and clicking is pretty off in Firefox.

Doesn't California impose strict emission regulations? Seems like a kind of bad analogy my man.

Office 365 is garbage. We had to ban people opening documents in share point through the web because absolutely destroyed the formatting of templated documents.

Doesn't appear to work?

After it generates clicking view doesn't seem to do anything and clicking on live site doesn't show components in a way that I'd expect.

Only if you have a parasocial relationship with Twitch, they're not your friend, at best they are your employer.

Well it's not what it could be at least it's better.

Have you played around with what region you're downloading from? You can change it manually and it may be worth checking out whether or not Sydney/Melbourne offer better download speeds than Brisbane.

You could change the license for future versions and charge for said updates, for the market that godot targets that would be more a little screwing to them.

How long would it take for someone to take over the project (if ever).

They don't though, if any developer had the means to take it to court it is incredibly likely that Unity would lose.

While TOS are rarely worth the toilet paper they could be printed on, I'm curious about whether arguments could be made about whether existing subscribers from 2019 could now sue for breach of contract and costs associated with (re)development.

Unfortunately I don't think it will mean that they will invest in Teams or improve it in any substantial way.

They've already put it out there and gotten their free market share.

No, the element inspector will tell you what css file the rule is coming from.

Yeah I would say "in one round, the collective wealth goes up 5% in expectation" but "for a finite population and starting wealth, the collective wealth will tend to 0 given enough rounds" not almost, but absolutely.

For a finite population and starting wealth, the collective wealth will tend to 0 given enough rounds.

The claim was: "Each round, the collective wealth goes up 5%, no matter how many rounds you run. "

And this isn't true.