nezirus

I've used them professionally during 0.9 times (2008.) and it was already quite useful and very stable (all advertised features worked). 17 years looks pretty good to me, Proxmox will not go away (neither product or company)

SuSE was my first Linux system and it helped a lot to spark my interest. Yast (software manager) and SaX (XFree86 configuration tool) were a Godsend for a noob like me in 199x.

It's still solid today, and I hold it in high regards, even if I moved to greener Linux pastures.

Podman beeing mostly compatible with docker was a wise choice. If you run rootless no way to break fw/network like docker can.

With podman in mind, one ought to try buildah and skopeo. Again, buildah can run Dockerfiles, but you are not constrained to the weird Dockerfile syntax.

Dunno, in new normal Germany, a refugee* from Palestine, seeking asylum from apartheid and maybe citizenship would first need to recognize the right of their occupator to exist. It is obviously much more important to fix sins from the past than help the living people. Politicians are full of ....

All while marches AfD closer to power every year.

* Lets pretend they could exit Gaza ot Eeast Bank.

The cynical voice inside me says it works as intended. The purpose of k8s is not to help you run your business/project/whatever, but a way to ascend to DevOps Nirvana. That means never-ending cycle of upgrades for the purpose of upgrading.

I guess too many people are using k8s where they should have used something simpler. It's fashionable to follow the "best practices" of FAANGs, but I'm not sure that's healthy for vast majority of other companies, which are simply not on the same scale and don't have armies of engineers (guardians of the holy "Platform")

So when I "sideload" HAProxy with my application, handling (incoming!) and outgoing http(s) and tcp connections, balanving, failover, logging and what not, that is cool now and I get to call it Ambassador Sandwich Pattern.

Dunno about others, but I always ask myself where these companies would be if their software was under non free license from the start.

This is hostile to end users, small people an companies, not just big megacorps wanting the "steal" the code and run it as a service. Be successful in running and using Hashicorp's software, and they decide to shut you down if you are deemed a competitor.

I am so pissed by this move, it is totally against the spirit of free software and GPL. Using additional contracts to subvert the free software licenses. You get to see the software, but you can't share it further. RedHat would not be here if someone behaved like this 25+ years ago.

I would prefer a variant of GPL which strictly forbids this (imo it should already be forbidden, these are clearly additional restrictions). Let's put "GPL v2 or later" to good use...