newshackr

Perhaps the incentive is for variable behavior. When there is low GPU demand, burn more, but reduce when there is contention.

They already paid for it though. The movie was done.

Transfer from people who need the money to live to Elon Musk who essentially has infinite money. Makes sense to allow this.

You can't sell these ETFs without incurring capital gains, potentially large. So it isn't really a choice.

That is also the case for many of the products on the Google killed by lists.

What if you want someone to look at a portion of it but they don't know enough to approve the whole thing. They give +1

Someone else knows the other portion well and sees the +1 and decides to +2.

In practice this ends the stalemate where partial owners don't feel confident to approve the whole thing

Maybe not great for the intended use case but guessing 28g of carbs for a 40g sandwich seems pretty close to me, particularly without knowing the dimensions of the bread etc

There isn't exactly a surplus of jobs today. While some may have this option, many do not.

Is this really the case though? Currently it appears to benefiting a small few and there is not much reason to think it will change going forward.

If 95% of jobs go away, the destabilization leads to violent conflicts, and power and wealth become more centralized does it really matter if we have better healthcare or automated cars? Will people have purpose in their lives? Will this be a better world for most?

Ads make total sense for a non-profit

Zug zug

This equivalent to over 600 years of pay for the whole company. Absolutely insane.

There is no way this name sticks. I thought it was from anthropic at first

Another word for it is corruption

NYC restricts building height to restrict population by land area. There isn't really a need for small apartments since population density is the limiting factor not space. You could build a not much more expensive apartment building instead of a dorm for the same population.