neverrroot

Thanks guys, you did the right thing.

This is just so incredibly disrespectful to so many people.

Wouldn’t it be amazing for Apple to give us a MacBook Air 15” M6 with a 15W sustained passive TDP capability?

Just amazing engineering push, the competition got the message and we benefit.

When you have an agenda to fulfill… and you must frame it negatively…

Naval had a great tweet recently:

“Science is not a process, a credential, or an institution. It is the unflinching pursuit of truth, carried out by the few, co-opted by the many.”

When did we start institutionalizing it? How about letting the truth be bent? What about the focus on consensus? That’s also what lead to the current situation.

> How did we get here? Careful what you wish for, that’s how.

Just a simple example: when you play with firm biological facts, you might just open it all up to being bent. But then, wasn’t that maybe the goal all along?

A few interesting undertone points in the article, for those who care:

- reliance on US technologies is not so good, but on Chinese is not discussed, just chosen

- environmental cost is of concern

- so are the energy costs

In the end, there are some clear tips on how to configure the LLM, but overall the article is a bit thin and rather biased.

You are really mixing things here, tbh, not sure whether in good faith.

How does it compare to DHH’s Omarchy? Looking for opinions from those who tried both.

This, cutting through the noise, this is it.

People who have not discovered the importance of time, and can’t appreciate an outstanding leadership.

Signature, a distinctive signature that looks like.

The “do good” behavior is astonishing